The media never pushing left MPs hard

Liam Hehir writes:

Unpopular stances held by politicians can come under intense scrutiny. Sometimes.

Consider Christopher Luxon’s pro-life position on abortion. Under repeat questioning, he painted himself into a corner by saying that the termination of a pregnancy is tantamount to murder, which is not the pro-life position. This sparked relentless questioning by the media and the controversy is still cited by his enemies today.

Such scrutiny isn’t unwarranted. After all, Luxon’s view is not a popular one, which I say as someone who is staunchly pro-life myself. 

The media’s role, among others, is to dissect controversial positions, especially those held by political leaders, and to hold them accountable for their views. That often involves the initial posing of the controversial subject then followed by probing supplemental questions and attempts to push them into difficult positions. This allows news consumers to make informed judgments about the consistency and sincerity of the politician’s views. 

So far, so good.

However, what is very notable is the apparent asymmetry in the treatment of unpopular politico-ideological positions. Right-leaning stances like Luxon’s are rigorously grilled. Equally if not more unpopular leftist positions, however, usually escape intense scrutiny.

Consider the case of Chloe Swarbrick, who is on the cusp of becoming the co-leader of the Green Party. Swarbrick has, in the past, voiced her support for prison abolition – not simply reform to make prisons more humane – but complete abolition. No more prisons, even for those convicted of terrible crimes.

Try running this concept by the average person, not those within the echo chamber of social media, and you’re likely to be met with a bewildered look of incredulity. People are often open to reduced sentences or non-custodial sentences for nonviolent offenders. But for violent criminals? That is a fringe position.

The idea of a society without prisons, particularly for murderers, rapists and the perpetrators of such terrible crimes seems, to normal people, bonkers in the extreme. And yet it is almost impossible to imagine Swarbrick facing anything like the media grilling Luxon received for his own unpopular views.

If the media were fair, then they would be asking Chloe the following:

• Would a Government you lead release Brendon Tarrant from prison?
• Why do you think mass murderers should be out in the community?
• Do you think serial rapists such as the Hooch rapists in Christchurch should be at large?
• Do you honestly think that every criminal can be rehabilitated?
• How would you protect abused women from their former partners who constantly break protection orders?

Of course this will never happen.