General Debate 28 December 2019

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment15

Uncategorized
General Debate

Comments (15)

Login to comment or vote

slightlyrighty

Hello!
4 1
Log in to Reply
Report
December 28, 2019 8:09am
slightlyrighty

Hello again!
4 1
Log in to Reply
Report
December 28, 2019 8:10am
jonnycomelately

I see the disinterment of the 29 Pike River miners has blown it’s budget and they are barely past the first seal. All to find out why the mine blew up. That’s easy, it was an unsafe mine.

Any underground mine where there is fire damp present is asking for trouble and has happened many times in the past.
16 1
Log in to Reply
Report
December 28, 2019 8:32am
- Sydney Alvarado
  
  I guess it will eventually fade away achieving nothing.
  
  11 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  December 28, 2019 9:38am
  - Greg Ettridge
    
    Not before Florence nightingale of NZ has a pre election photo op, even it is just inside the tomb, the opportunity will be to big to miss. No good throwing more money at it till the right moment. Election is still along way off and could be many more COL “what were we thinking” moments to come.
    2020 the year NZ finds out just how stupid or astute they are as a country, it will be the voters decision, even though less than half can decide, even 5 % can decide an election outcome. Great voting system, not.
    
    8 3
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    December 28, 2019 11:18am
- Tony Stuart
  
  Even Andrew Little and Damien O’Connor knew that mining on the West Coast was not without danger:
  
  EPMU National secretary Andrew Little (now a Labour MP) told the New Zealand Herald on November 22 2010 that there was “nothing unusual about Pike River or this mine that we’ve been particularly concerned about”.
  
  He then appeared on TVNZ’s Close Up to again defend PRC management.
  
  He told Close Up that underground mining was inherently unsafe and the risk of gas explosions, particularly on the West Coast, was high.
  
  While the industry was aware of the risks and took the necessary precautions, unfortunately these kinds of incidents still happened, he argued.
  
  On November 26, 2010 the Dominion Post ran an article that denounced ‘wild’ rumours that the mine was not safe. It declared that “Any suggestion of obvious or known safety lapses does not find traction with unionised staff or union leader Andrew Little.”
  
  Andrew Little’s conciliatory views toward PRC management were echoed by Labour MP Damien O’Connor. He suggested that no one was responsible for the accident and that the disaster was “just one of these things that the West Coast unfortunately has had to get used to over the years”.
  
  https://nzagainstthecurrent.blogspot.com/2014/12/how-andrew-little-failed-pike-river.html
  
  How his views changed when there was political capital to be gained from it. So who should we believe; Little the unionist, or Little the politician?
  
  25 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  December 28, 2019 9:47am
  - Tall Man
    
    Little the liar?
    
    16 2
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    December 28, 2019 10:02am
  - Ruahine
    
    Neither.
    
    5 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    December 28, 2019 10:37am
  - Stephieboy2
    
    The Little who recognises the physical fact that West Coast mines are potentially unsafe ( like most underground mines and why historically mine there in the first place? ) .
    
    The Little who wants to gain entry into the Pike Rivee time with its attendant risks!
    
    1 11
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    December 28, 2019 11:03am
    - Prince
      
      The Little who will chase any ambulance, wave any corpse if it gets him and his mates a few votes. Despicable.
      
      8 1
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      December 28, 2019 3:58pm
- Komata
  
  Jcl@0832
  
  Exactly; the ‘Coast coalfields are renowned for the phenomenon, but if its going to make political capital and help re-election, who cares? Photo-ops are FAR more important than mere human lives.
  
  13 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  December 28, 2019 10:40am
Captain Mainwaring

Two is better than one.
15 2
Log in to Reply
Report
December 28, 2019 8:43am
- Humble Capitalist
  
  And far better than none
  
  6 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  December 28, 2019 8:49am
themanwhowatches

Kind of related to DPF’s post about the disapproval of sugar by people who know better than we do, has anybody else noticed how frequently Stuff inserts the word “booze” into articles related to alcohol? Because “booze” has the whiff of disapproval about it, a not too subtle jab from those who have decided we need to be re-educated. Yesterday it was in the headline to an article lifted straight from the Washington Post, with no attempt at all to relate it to a New Zealand audience. In fact it was inserted into the headline: “How a decade of drinking changed the future of booze”, and in the article itself the word “booze” was not used – there was one reference to “a boozy cocktails culture”. Subliminal messaging from Stuff’s string pullers? Mend your ways, you great unwashed.
17 2
Log in to Reply
Report
December 28, 2019 10:38am
- Inandout
  
  Worry not theman, this time next year Stuff will be history.
  
  6 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  December 28, 2019 4:04pm

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« Health ****s at it again

Aucklanders want the truth »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 37.4K other subscribers

Highlights

Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments
Health Target 3 – Emergency Dept Waiting Times
Health Target 2 – Immunisations

Links

COP29 Leaves Poor Countries Fuming
Utopia
Hey Razor – What The Hell Is Going On With The All Blacks
No Minister
John McLean: Jolly Rogers, Nga Mihi...Ngarangi
Breaking Views
END GAME
The Standard
MEDIAWATCH: Q+A – Jack Tame destroys David Seymour
The Daily Blog
Word of the day
Hompaddock
Treaty Principles Debate
NZCPR
Much ado about cussing…
Point of Order
Justice in Brazil
No Right Turn
"Seymour is only doing openly what M?ori nationalists and their Pakeha allies have been doing, quietly for the past 50 years."
Not PC
The transgender agenda sunk Kamala
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
What does “reciprocity” mean in New Zealand laws?
Croaking Cassandra
Media Link: “A View from Afar” on the US elections.
Kiwipolitico
This will not end well
Offsetting Behaviour
Top 14 Predictions for Round 10
Stats Chat
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d