General Debate 2 November 2017

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment324

Uncategorized
General Debate

Comments (324)

Login to comment or vote

Digmen1

Good on Donald Trump for speaking out against islamist terrorism.
67 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:02am
- Inandout
  
  Sure makes a change from Obama’s ‘don’t mention Islam’ responses.
  
  55 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:13am
  - SPC
    
    The intellectual response, to distinguish between Moslems and terrorists (most victims of terrorist acts are Moslems), so as to recognise common cause against terrorists.
    
    An attempt not to be tribal and divide against Moslems. The terrorists of course have other ideas. They want to either cower (subjugate Moslem populations or intimidate the west into appeasement), or realise such a division. Division they would attempt to exploit to radicalise more Moslems to their cause.
    
    In the end though, words have stuff all to do with outcomes.
    
    3 6
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:40am
- EAD_TWO
  
  The problem is though Digmen1 is that whenever he tries to do anything, Brits* & Americans* wield their power to stop it:
  
  http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-rabbis-donald-trump-muslim-ban-letter-protest-a7556526.html
  
  UK rabbis protest Donald Trump’s travel ban in open letter: ‘We stand beside our Muslim cousins’
  
  http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/223242/jewish-groups-across-the-spectrum-unite-in-condemnation-of-trumps-refugee-ban
  
  Jewish Groups Across the Spectrum Unite in Condemnation of Trump’s Refugee Ban
  
  And in the latest developments, Trump has tried to close dual citizen Chuck Schumer’s “Diversity Visa Lottery Program” only to be attacked en masse by those from Schumer’s clan:
  
  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-01/trump-blames-schumer-immigration-policy-nyc-terror-attack
  
  9 20
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:21am
  - Classic Liberal
    
    “‘We stand beside our Muslim cousins’”
    They should read the quran sometime and see where the ‘muslim cousins’ think they stand…
    
    20 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:31am
    - EAD_TWO
      
      They’ve been helping each other out since before the Gates of Toledo Classic Liberal.
      
      PS: You should read the Talmud to see where the Gentiles stand!
      
      1 17
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 11:28am
      - treadingthemill
        
        You should read the Talmud to see where the Gentiles stand!
        
        You should read the Bible and see where European Pagans stood when they were invaded by another Middle Eastern religion. It’s amusing no end to hear you complain about Jews and Muslims when you advocate your own Middle Eastern religion which nearly destroyed indigenous European cultural traditions and religions.
        
        11 5
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:40am
      - Classic Liberal
        
        EAD: Jews don’t want to kill Gentiles. Islamists do want to actually kill Jews.
        
        I’ve never said I support the incredibly sexist Orthodox Judaism, if that’s what you mean.
        
        4 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 2:37pm
- Victor Omega
  
  Especially when the MSM are FOS.
  
  Both herald and Stuff parroted US articles (CNN, WAPO etc..) which said the driver of the ute was shouting “God is great” in Arabic.
  
  Bullshit. He was (of course) shouting “Allahu Akbar” which means “Allah is greater”.
  
  Unlike people who say “God is Great”, people who shout “Allahu Akbar” DO NOT HAVE PEACEFUL INTENTIONS. It is a terrorist battle cry, meant to “strike fear into the hearts of non-believers”.
  
  The major news outlets in NZ are pathetic.
  
  ref: http://m.jpost.com/Opinion/Allahu-Akbar-468684
  
  38 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:22am
  - Odakyu-sen
    
    It would seem that Allah has a different game plan to that of God.
    Are they the same construct or different?
    
    15 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:29am
    - Victor Omega
      
      Did you rtfa?
      
      “Allahu” is the nominative form of the word “Allah,” the name of God in Islam. It is not God. There is a significant difference between the name of God and the word “god.”
      
      4 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 8:32am
      - KevOB
        
        It is not God as the One revealed through His Son Jesus Christ.
        
        10 3
        Report
        November 2, 2017 9:05am
      - SPC
        
        There is no name of God in Islam, the Arabic term means “the God”.
        
        3 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 9:22am
      - SPC
        
        Allah Akbar means God is great, Allahu Akbar means God is greater.
        
        1 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 3:12pm
    - cmm
      
      It’s like the difference between assault rifle and semi-automatic rifle.
      
      They are both have the same function but the different terminology shows different intent in usage.
      
      11 3
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 8:40am
    - treadingthemill
      
      It would seem that Allah has a different game plan to that of God.
      Are they the same construct or different?
      
      They are both constructs, and they are both formed from the same Middle Eastern mythic matrix. There are differences between how Judaism, Christianity and Islam view this god, but also similarities.
      
      5 3
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:08am
      - Kimbo
        
        Yep. The word “God” (or “gods”) in Hebrew is elohim. In the related Semitic Arabic is is Allah. You can see and hear the similarity. The original (Jewish) Christians including Jesus spoke another related Semitic language, Aramaic, but the word is similar – hence Jesus’ words on the cross, quoting Pslam 22:1, “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?/My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”
        
        The New Testament was written in Greek, so it used the standard word for God/gods in that language, ho Theos (the God). From whence we get the word theology. And as Christianity is a religion of many languages, it adapts and uses the local ethnic equivalent when translating the New Testament. Hence “Deus” in Latin, “Atua” in Maori and Polynesian languages…
        
        However, the name for God is different for Muslims and Jews. For Muslims it is also…Allah. For Jews it is written, as per the Old Testament/Tanakh as YHWH (Semitic languages were originally written without vowels), and pious Jews never pronounce it. Instead, they substitute alternatives such as Ha Shem (the name), or Adonai (Lord). For the non-pious we usually say “Yahweh”…from whence the awful English ersatz “Jehovah” derives. For that reason instead of using Yahweh, the New Testament inserts the Greek word Kurios/Lord – which was also the practice adopted by a Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament from approximately 200BC, the Septuagint/LXX.
        
        However, and as per treadingthemill, just because there are similarities, does not make then identical.
        
        Jews believe God is a singular monad, who can and will only reveal himself through prophets – and a future Messiah – who are descended from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. hence, Islam must be false…as Muhammad, while purportedly descended from Abraham, is via Ishmael, not Isaac. Therefore he is a Gentile.
        
        Similarly Jesus, while a Jew, is rejected – and was crucified – because he claimed to be…Yahweh Elohim. For them the Christian doctrine of the trinity is heretical tritheism.
        
        Christians reject modern Judaism (but not the Old Testament), as they believe that while there is only one God, he is revealed in three persons – the trinity – of “the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ/the Messiah) and the Holy Spirit”. Hence for Christians that is God’s name that is pronounced at the baptism. Also, as Christ is the greatest revelation of God’s will and being that will ever be given…Muhammed who came some 600 years later is rejected.
        
        Muslims, like Jews believe God is a monad, not triune. However, as both Jews and Christians reject Muhammed as a prophet, and they think Christians are tritheists, therefore Muslims reject Judaism and Christianity. Muslims acknowledge Adam, Enoch, Noah, Moses, David and Jesus as prophets and in theory at least, they affirm both the Torah and Psalms of the Old Testament as Scriptural, and the new Testament Gospels as authoritative. However, as the content of those Scriptures are at odds with the supposed revelations taht came through Muhammed…the Muslim explanation is that the Jews and Christians have changed them after Muhmammed. Therefore, in practice Muslims seldom refer to them other than to expose the supposed falsehoods of Judaism or Christianity…or where it supports Muslim doctrine, as an apologetic exercise.
        
        6 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 12:23pm
      - Ed Snack
        
        It seems that the original post is not being followed. The claim is, and it’s one I’ve also posted on, is that the claimed translation of Allahu Akbar is not “God is Great” as it would be understood in English. Rather it is a specific slogan proclaiming the superior greatness of “Allah” over the “God(s)” of others. That interpretation derives from the specific superlative cases used in the expression. More literally the translation is “God is the greatest” with the implied possessive “My God is greatest”.
        
        To call it a simple affirmation of the greatness of “God” is to misinterpret the intention of the call. It is specifically meant as a boast or threat, hence its use as it is used.
        
        4 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:21pm
      - Kimbo
        
        @cEd Snack
        
        It seems that the original post is not being followed…To call it a simple affirmation of the greatness of “God” is to misinterpret the intention of the call. It is specifically meant as a boast or threat, hence its use as it is use
        
        No, not necessarily. Because Allah in Arabic doubles as both a title/description for deity in general, and also as the name of the specific deity who supposedly manifested himself to Muhammed
        
        …it is, or at least it could well be both/and. So in the first instance it is a false dichotomy to make the claim you/the writer of the Jerusalem Post article has. Which is why, instead, he, rightly, avoids discussing the ranges of meaning of “Allah” because as it would not suit his argument, and instead concentrates on the verb akbar to sell the idea:
        
        Akbar is a elative form of the root k-b-r. Kbr means big or great…
        
        Bottom line: All words and phrases in all languages- including Allah Akbar – have a range of potential meanings, and it is the specific context in which they are used that narrows and then nails down the specific meaning.
        
        In the sense that “Allah Akbar” on the lips of a suicide bomber or similar terrorist or jihadist is an assertion of Allah’s superiority over the beliefs of the infidels and idolaters against whom war is being waged…yeah, sure. Often/maybe always it can mean that.
        
        But no, it may be very possible that “Allah akbar” can appear on the lips of the peaceful pious Muslim worshipper in other contexts, like say during haj. And if the retort is…”there is no such thing as peaceful Isalm as it is automatically violen/militantt”, well, that is irrelevant to the intended meaning of the speaker.
        
        Plus, um, an equivalent is the Christian confession “Jesus Christ is Lord”, and also the ultimate confession of Judaism, the Shema: “Hear, O Israel, the LORD (Yahweh) our God, the LORD (Yahweh) is one”. In the first instance they affirm a standard bedrock position of piety. But, yes, by implication, and in the right context there is is also the understanding – any other “Lords” (a title used by Caesar, a supposed and self-proclaimed god at the time of the New Testament) are to be
        
        …nor any other God/gods, be they Ba’al, Molech, Chemosh as when the Shema was placed on the lips of Moses in the Torah.
        
        3 1
        Report
        November 2, 2017 2:11pm
      - Kimbo
        
        @ Ed Snack
        
        Also, I seem to recall the Turkish soldiers shouted “Allah Akbar” when charging the Anzacs. Religious meaning asserting Islam over Christianity? For some, maybe and the Turkd tried – unsuccessfully in many cases – to portray the Great War as a jihad rather than a clash of nations/empires. After all, some of their Muslim Arab subjects revolted against them, and the Ottomans were allied with the Christian Empires/nations of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria!
        
        But in many cases Allah Akbar” was likely a reflexive learned thing that was as traditional as “For God, England and St George”/Deutscland uber alles/Vive la France!” Sure you can mean it…or you are just shouting it because you need to shout something when charging a machine gun and trench full of rifles! 😉
        
        Plus, um, ok, so akbar is elative in form, similar to the superlative in English…”greatest”. Um, but so what? That is a standard claim for each of the three great monotheistic religions to make of their deity…indeed it is a rhetorical device because when you boil it down, none of them – Judaism, Christianty and Islam – believe any true deity exists…beyond their own as they conceive him. Hence, as per the Jewish Shema, “The LORD our God is (the only) one”! 😉
        
        2 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 2:28pm
      - Gruffydd
        
        GOTT MIT UNS
        
        4 2
        Report
        November 2, 2017 3:20pm
      - Flash
        
        Good discussion for a cool and cloudy friday morning.
        Thanks!
        
        0 0
        Report
        December 22, 2017 10:14am
    - SPC
      
      You could simply perceive Judaism, Christianity and Islam as the three theisms.
      
      They each claim to derive from revealed knowledge of the one God.
      
      Call them stage one (belief in the first revelation), two (belief in the first and second revelation) and three (belief in the first, some of the second and third).
      
      2 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:22am
PhilBest

Quotes of the day from the latest columns of incisive opinion writers, which NZ sorely lacks.

1) Kurt Schlichter: “…What is inexcusable are alleged Republicans going onto liberal media outlets to trash the base by sanctimoniously adopting lying liberal narratives about us and then basking in the loving liberal limelight their new liberal buddies temporarily bestow upon them. McCain pioneered that move, though he’s kind of the Sideshow Bob of maverickry – he’ll go through a period of liberal love then do something remotely conservative, like run for president, and his lib lovers will turn on him and he’ll stand there with hurt feelz and a rake mark on his sad face wondering, “What happened to all my new friends?”….
16 4
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:04am
- Gabby
  
  Krut Schitter’s such a snoflake girlyman.
  
  1 7
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 11:59am
Left Right and Centre

Ignorance is bliss, interesting Titanic survivors . . .

Kate (Manning, then age 17 third class passenger from Queenstown Ireland) recounted that the magnitude of the disaster unfolding at the time escaped her and she naïvely thought that this was the regular way to make it to America.

hahaha – fark me – the *regular way to make it to America* !!!!!
15 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:04am
- kowtow
  
  Context would be useful.
  
  5 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:55am
PhilBest

2) Matt Walsh: “…In our society, we expect our children to be adults but our adults to be children. We protect college students from opposing ideas but we make no effort to protect elementary school students from all manner of perversion and deviancy. We provide safe spaces at universities but not kindergarten classrooms. We’ve determined that our kids are capable of choosing their own gender by the age of 3, but not capable of living on their own or paying for their own health care at the age of 25. We demand that our 5-year-olds be eighteen so that our 18-year-olds can be five. We expose when we should shield and shield when we should expose. We have everything inside out and backwards, and the result is a country filled with inside out and backwards people…

“…”They’re going to learn about it some day.” “You can’t shield them forever.” “They can handle it.” “Stop being overprotective.” These are the justifications we use as we raise a generation of prepubescent porn addicts. Somehow, though, these same arguments don’t apply exactly where they should: to young adults — emphasis on adults — who cannot handle opposing opinions or foreign viewpoints without dissolving into a puddle of self-pitying tears. We have decided that we cannot shield our toddlers from discussions of sodomy, but we can and do shield our grown children from challenging ideas…”
19 6
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:04am
Luke Piewalker

Still shaking my head that Trevor Mallard will be the speaker.
50 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:05am
- doggone7
  
  It’s one of the best things about that new lot coming into Government!
  
  9 2
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:28am
- Paulus
  
  Of course Mallard will be as unbiased as Margaret Wilson was !
  As a Deputy he was not bad BUT now is another day.
  Remember the saying goes “The Working Class may kiss my arse I’ve got the Foreman’s job at last”.
  The Coalition from hell is going to need all the help it can get.
  Go for it Trev.
  
  32 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:28am
  - softail 1450
    
    paulus,,,,pol pot would make a better speaker than Margaret Wilson ,that was a disgusting time in the NZ parliament and we all remember who installed Wilson in that job ,yes h1 and h2 and now those two are back in charge ……
    
    27 2
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:49am
    - RF
      
      softail.
      
      Two evil old crones who will look after their chic and bring her up to continue their evil ways.
      
      13 1
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:01am
    - flipper
      
      The screaming skull who abolished the PC for New Zealand, and appointed ….. (must not go there 🙂 )
      
      8 2
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 11:02am
- UrbanNeocolonialist
  
  The speaker should be civil service posting to preserve neutrality, not an MP.
  
  14 4
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:37am
  - cmm
    
    The issue with that is one of governance.
    
    The MPs are supposed to be the public’s eyes and ears controlling the the civil service. Therefore it becomes problematic giving a civil servant the position to limit what the MPs can say.
    
    15 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:43am
  - fylde
    
    since when are the civil service neutral – they encourage wasteful spending and empire building – great example of an agency problem
    
    6 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:10am
  - Liberty
    
    Sir Humphrey as speaker.
    No Parliament is above having the tea boy as Speaker
    Besides the Jobs gone to the village idiot.
    Highly likely to imitate Wilson.
    Could be interesting time in Parliament.
    
    8 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 11:24am
- GazzaW
  
  Mallard has coveted that role for many years and without doubt has one of the best understandings of parliamentary procedures of anyone in the House. How he applies that knowledge is what matters most. Will he be biassed and contemptuous as was the vile Margaret Wilson or will he be quite open and balanced as was Lockwood Smith? I’m prepared to give Trev a three month trial on the basis of his proven knowledge and on the basis that this will in all likelihood be his final term and it’s an opportunity for him to leave Parliament having earned the respect of both sides of the House. Mallard has his faults but he is a traditionalist when it comes to Parliamentary procedures.
  
  26 3
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:37am
  - Paulus
    
    Trevor will do as he is told by Heather (H2).
    Same as Margaret Wilson was.
    
    16 2
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:11am
    - GazzaW
      
      We’ll see. I think that this is more than just a job for Mallard and he will not want to be compromised in that role.
      
      5 2
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:20am
  - Gabby
    
    He couldn’t be worse than Carsehole guzzla.
    
    1 10
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 12:03pm
- KevOB
  
  Trevor in his early day in parliament stood out as one as one of the best attacks dogs Labour ever had. He was sharp. He was probably suppressed as he would show the leader up.
  
  I expect Trevor Mallard to be a capable Speaker. He has much more ability than most of the new government members.
  
  16 2
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:09am
- RF
  
  Sitting here clutching a mug of cold coffee and after reading the current news both local and worldwide I am beginning to think we are fucked.
  
  It would be good to hibernate for 10 years and wake up to find it was a bad dream.
  
  14 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:48am
  - SPC
    
    Did you read the Herald article on what one EMP weapon (nuclear blast over North America) could do to the USA?
    
    7 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:52am
    - mara
      
      A very interesting book on this topic is One Second After by William R. Forstchen. Scary.
      
      2 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 12:29pm
Captain Mainwaring

Who are these idiots calling for us to take on the 700 Manus Island ‘refugees’ because Australia doesn’t want them?
These people are not refugees, they are queue-jumpers, and they should be transported back to whatever shithole they came from.
If Ms. Jacinda Fix-Everything brings them here her Government will pay the price.
70 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:06am
- kowtow
  
  Taxpayers will pay the price.
  
  37 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:10am
- waikatogirl
  
  The 700 Manus Island queue jumpers have been GIVEN resettlement by PNG but the overstayers are refusing to take up the offer by the Island nation of resettlement on the Island, insisting instead the Australian government resettle them on Australian soil.
  
  47 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:15am
  - Captain Mainwaring
    
    So they probably don’t want to come to NZ anyway and Australia won’t want us to take them because they would eventually get into Australia via the back door.
    
    33 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:18am
    - Classic Liberal
      
      “So they probably don’t want to come to NZ anyway” I’m pretty sure they would like to: it’s better than png.
      
      We could have all the issues Germany has been suffering.
      
      16 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 9:42am
      - marcw
        
        If NZ has to survive the COL for a full term, then “it’s better than PNG” is starting to look in doubt.
        
        8 1
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:51am
  - Digmen1
    
    These guys are so arrogrant.
    Demanding this, Resisting that, Begging for this.
    
    They are lucky someone has fed them for the last 5 years!
    Time they were sent back in a Hercules and given a parachute each. Jump when you want to, or we will push you out over the sea or in the middle of Saudi Arabia.
    
    24 3
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:27am
  - Gabby
    
    They may have heard someone mumbling ‘meat’s back on the menu boys.’
    
    3 2
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 12:05pm
  - MH
    
    PNG = persona non grata.
    
    2 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 4:13pm
- Maxx
  
  I’m sure we’ll see a ferry service soon enough on a regular cycle to pick up refugees. We can’t expect them to make such an arduous journey.
  
  18 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:38am
  - Classic Liberal
    
    Yes, and it will encourage more, many more.
    
    7 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:43am
- VicParking
  
  I’m sick of Red Radio call them ‘refugees’. I agree tgaey are illegal immigrants plain and simple.
  
  40 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:41am
- cmm
  
  “her Government will pay the price.”
  
  They are already paying the price.
  
  If you take the latest Roy Morgan poll (Labour = 31%) and then apply the correction for their bias (Labour -3%) then you get Labour at 28%.
  
  28% is surely the lowest polling a major governing party has ever had in NZ a month after an election.
  
  25 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:53am
- softail 1450
  
  captain, the Aussie media are saying that most of the men have serious psychological problems ,these people are not our problem ,let the fricking Aussies sort there own problems out.
  I don’t care how good it will make us look to the bloody UN we don’t want them here….
  
  23 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:54am
  - Classic Liberal
    
    “let the fricking Aussies sort there own problems out.” Not quite fair, the Aussies never wanted them and tried to make that clear. Have you seen the Oz military ‘No Way’ video on youtube? They have shown that in all relevant countries.
    
    13 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:46am
    - Gabby
      
      Why didn’t they send them back. Sadistic fuckers.
      
      0 4
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 12:07pm
- RF
  
  Captain…..
  
  These idiots are our self elected Govt who want to allow angry young Moslems to come into our peaceful country to conduct their terror activities.
  
  Somehow I do not think our new Govt is going to have a peaceful time.
  
  Does anyone know any good books about the activities of the maquis in WW2.
  
  9 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:57am
- backster
  
  If Taxinda does bring them in then expect Winston to roll over and say ‘Yes Maam!’
  
  10 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 11:30am
tom hunter

Let’s turn to Facebook, which according to author James Bovard blocked his post labeled “Janet Reno, Tyrant or Saint?” and including video of the burning of the Branch Davidian compound during an FBI raid in 1993.

When he retitled the post, “Janet Reno, American Saint,” and substituted an official portrait of the late attorney general for the Branch Davidian burning, his post was immediately accepted.

I can see a lot fun being had with Mr Zuckerberg’s creation.
17 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:06am
PhilBest

3) Daniel Greenfield: “…All that clout which brought in Oscars, fawning media profiles and the frightened compliance of the women Weinstein abused, didn’t come from his cash, it came from his role as a culture warrior of the left…

“…Harvey Weinstein got his clout as a culture warrior. An alphabet soup of lefty groups, right up to the UN, was eager to give him what he wanted because they saw him as championing their agenda.

He rolled out movies that pushed the left’s social and political agendas like no other company did. And in return, he got the same “rape pass” that Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton and other top lefties did.

It wasn’t mere money that intimidated his victims. Harvey’s millions alone didn’t buy him the right to assault and then silence women, some of whom became famous and powerful in their own right, in an industry that is the subject of constant media attention and scrutiny. It was his connections on the left.

Harvey Weinstein shoveled large amounts of money into the media and lefty groups. But more than mere cash, he had their loyalty because he fought the cultural battles that they wanted him to fight…

“…What no one in Hollywood or the media can say is that the women whom he abused were collateral damage in a culture war. Harvey ran an assembly line on which movies about the left’s latest social agenda were rolled out. If you wanted campus rapes, police brutality, transgender, gay rights, anti-Israel or anything from the Left “R” Us emporium, he made it happen. And the price was ignoring the screams coming from his hotel rooms and the office storage rooms that he allegedly brought women to.

Harvey Weinstein didn’t assault women ‘despite’ his leftist politics as the media alleges in its fumbling efforts to connect him to toxic masculinity. He assaulted women because of his leftist politics. It was his politics that made him feel safe assaulting women. And it was his politics that made them feel unsafe about turning him in. How do you take on a man who has Planned Parenthood in his back pocket?

And it was his cultural transgressiveness that won him a pass. The cultural pioneers of the left who break all sorts of sexual boundaries are expected to occasionally transgress boundaries like consent. That’s true across the entertainment industry. And it was true across the counterculture in general…

“…Harvey Weinstein’s willingness to push cultural boundaries insulated him from accusations of abuse by, on the one hand, making him appear too virtuously leftist to do such a thing, and on the other hand, giving him a pass for being too transgressive to be bound by the conventions of bourgeois morality…”
18 6
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:09am
- flipper
  
  Boring… Boring … Boring ….. and Boring for anything further similar….
  
  10 11
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:18am
  - tom hunter
    
    Perhaps – but it’s a big part of the reason why National is so timid so often here in NZ.
    
    As several Lefty commentators noted a few years ago, National held firm on some development projects when under attack from Greens and Labour, but caved the moment Lucy Lawless and company went public in opposition.
    
    20 3
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:34am
- SPC
  
  The film studio boss was a bully within the industry – fear of career sabotage silenced people.
  
  The rich silence media by litigation threat.
  
  11 2
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:31am
  - All_on_Red
    
    ‘The rich silence media by litigation threat.’
    There’s truth in that. But I think also leftist media will avoid exposing their fellow travellers when they do wrong.
    As the saying goes ‘ it’s the Medias job to cover a story. With a pillow. Until it stops moving’
    
    14 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:53am
    - SPC
      
      Did you see the Entourage clips, relentlessly portraying Weinstein as a bully – years ago?
      
      And one of the cartoon series Family Guy warning about Spacey as well.
      
      http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/30/entertainment/seth-macfarlane-kevin-spacey/index.html
      
      7 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 8:59am
      - All_on_Red
        
        ‘Help, I’ve escaped from Kevin Spaceys basement!’
        Wow.
        Damn shame. I’ve been a fan of his for a long time. His voice impressions of people are just fantastic too.
        Its interesting that only now the dam has burst. Every day we read about more coming forward. I think some will inevitably be those trying to seek monetary gain (is patting someone’s bottom or kissing them really serious sexual assault?) but the shear numbers show there really is a major problem.
        The thing is, it’s probably been going on for nigh a 100 years.
        
        8 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 9:10am
  - DifferentPerspective
    
    Lawfare is as much of a core Leftist tactic as it is of the rich, but I forget myself …
    
    “It’s OK when the Left do it”.
    
    8 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:12am
- SPC
  
  Daniel Greenfield blames the left for rape, terrorism, racism against white people, and claims “the left” are not loyal to America but to diversity. Same old un-American line.
  
  Why, identify the left as now fellow travellers with the Moslems?
  
  His siding with the GOP crowd in the culture war serves him well in advocacy of a hard-line against Moslems (what he is best known for).
  
  1 6
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:56am
  - PhilBest
    
    Truth hurts, and must be suppressed, this is a specialty of the left and its stooges.
    
    9 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:01am
    - SPC
      
      The crowd is swayed and then divided as intended. Played.
      
      0 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 11:05am
- SGA
  
  PhilBest
  
  Harvey Weinstein didn’t assault women ‘despite’ his leftist politics as the media alleges in its fumbling efforts to connect him to toxic masculinity. He assaulted women because of his leftist politics.
  
  Pfft… by that reasoning some abusers don’t do it despite their Christianity (say) but because of it? I try not to judge all of Christianity on the actions of the Graeme Capills or Hopeful Christians of this world.
  As I see it, there are people of all stripes who abuse positions of power and influence over others.
  
  11 3
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:06am
  - PhilBest
    
    You can’t see the difference between the prevailing moral belief system in Christianity, which makes hypocrites, “hypocrites”; and the prevailing moral belief system among Progressives, which makes “free love” and destruction of moral standards, “the” standard? Which makes people like Weinstein (and Hefner, and hook-up quickie “daters” everywhere) bold warriors for the cause?
    
    Daniel Greenfield refers to getting “…a pass for being too transgressive to be bound by the conventions of bourgeois morality…” and he fails to point out that in progressive circles, surely the women are assumed to hold this position too? Otherwise what are they doing in Showbiz at all? If they are known to hold ideals of honour and purity, that makes them “conservatives”, and no conservatives are allowed to be hired in Hollywood and Big Entertainment.
    
    3 5
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:31am
    - SGA
      
      What I see is that some people in positions of power, influence, and trust abuse those positions – be they left/right, religious/non-religious, conservative/progressive.
      As this problem also surfaces in individuals and organisations with a prevailing moral belief based on Christianity, your ranting about “free love” and Progressives as the prime cause of such behaviour seems misdirected.
      
      6 3
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:49am
    - SPC
      
      Are you arguing that those of Christian standards, hire Christians and that those that run Hollywood/Big Entertainment are not Christians, so only want workers without Christian standards?
      
      1 1
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 11:10am
kowtow

Thanks Angela . Communist from East Germany fucking up German society.

“With police statistics showing drug-related crime at its highest rate in a decade, and a rise in violent crime of 3.6 percent from 2015 to 2016, a heated debate continues over whether Germany’s fourth city is becoming unmanageable.”

https://www.thelocal.de/20171101/crime-in-cologne-living-dangerous
27 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:13am
- PhilBest
  
  You mean Germany’s “centre right” Vichy sellout to the PC, SJW, virtue-signalling Left, leaving no electoral alternative apart from “far” right parties.
  
  5 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:15am
  - Classic Liberal
    
    ‘Far right’ like the AfD, which isn’t ‘far right’ in the least, just wants a similar immigration points system to that in Australia and Canada. Germany is completely stuffed, because it just can’t get its head around the fact that the Nazi crimes don’t mean they have to be total pushovers for islamists these days.
    
    13 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:58am
    - PhilBest
      
      And Swedes don’t have to atone for the crime of being blond and blue-eyed, either. You don’t even need an actual Nazi past, to be swamped by the SJW quisling agenda. We ignore the existence of this agenda even in NZ, at our peril – and we want a centre-right less squishy than the 2008-2017 National government to truly represent our interests.
      
      5 2
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:34am
Maxx

So Industry-wide strikes are apparently impossible under Fair Pay Agreements http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11939465

Is that because the unions will state what they want and the legislation will grant this (after open and transparent negotiations of course).
20 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:18am
- waikatogirl
  
  No Maxx, it is because Cindy pronounced before the election “that strikes will not happen under her leadership”. Being relentlessly positive will prevent any strikes. ?
  
  Let’s Do This! ?
  
  37 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:24am
  - Maxx
    
    Does this mean we are going to see a parliamentary cheerleading squad shortly? I expect that this will be an equal opportunity squad with a legislated Male/Female/LGBTQI ratio.
    
    I would also like to see a definition of what “this” is that we are doing. I have standards.
    
    14 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:28am
- AgainstTheFlow
  
  I don’t know what is Business NZ’s strategy is on the Industrial laws changes.
  Is it to stay still, play dead and hope the beating stops sooner?
  Is it hoping that if business doesn’t publicly oppose anything, there won’t be worse measures imposed?
  
  16 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:59am
labrator

Labour acting exactly as National should have 9 years ago. Everything assumed to be rhetorical isn’t, they’re wiping everything they said they would and then some. Who cares about the honeymoon, if in 100 days they make big changes, the electorate gets another 900 to forget about it. JK’s honeymoon lasted his entire time in parliament and he did nothing with it. No big calls, no substantiative changes, just steady as she goes leadership. Sure, the economy is great but now we have Labour at the tiller ready to wipe that out. Then what? National comes in, mops it up again and then says to Labour “have another go at socialism, we didn’t touch anything, just fixed that money problem you were having”…

My prediction: Now Ardern is in power, she’ll be able to spin her way through any short term issues, look Prime Ministerial enough and wipe National out in the second term which will look a lot like the 9 years of National coming back for a second dip. Winston will be gone, not sure on the Greens, if they keep their parasitical nature, they might live on as the Hard-left, enviro, communist vote for Labour. It’s not what I want but I’m not convinced the predicted apocalypse of the hydra will ever appear and the longer Ardern is in power the more people will just accept her as electable.
18 10
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:21am
- tom hunter
  
  Pretty much my take also – which is why I’m making the plans I am.
  
  It’s less to do with a reaction to Green-Labour – as if I’d follow the path of the US Left-wing numpties who screamed about leaving for Canada because of Bush, and then Trump – than the uselessness of National to come in 2023 or 2026.
  
  12 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:40am
- brett68
  
  Unfortunately, Keys inability to make hard calls will enable labour to push NZ way further left.
  After this Labour government, we’ll be so far left it will be impossible to reverse, the mass of voters receiving some form of government handout/subsidy will be in the majority and they won’t vote for a party who will take away “their money”
  
  Looking forward there are only two paths, us becoming New Greece or we become New Sweden/Finland.
  
  22 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:59am
  - Classic Liberal
    
    “the mass of voters receiving some form of government handout/subsidy will be in the majority”
    
    You’re not wrong about that. I was thinking National could maybe divide and rule: e.g. cut the silly ‘first year free’ without even telling voters that you’re going to, but very loudly promise more support for high achieving students on useful courses. promise a good lower middle class tax break that they can’t resist. Etc…
    
    9 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:10am
    - brett68
      
      I think Nationals problem is that they became so poll driven which stifled any decision making.
      
      It became more about retaining power then actually leading and getting stuff done.
      
      8 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:24am
      - PhilBest
        
        No it was worse than that. They didn’t follow the polls on the anti smacking law, did they?
        
        The only way to explain their behaviour, is that they ran with, not the polls, but what the PC, SJW talking heads in the media were saying they should do. Winning virtue brownie points from the gate-keepers of the “culture”.
        
        9 4
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:36am
      - Classic Liberal
        
        “they ran with, not the polls, but what the PC, SJW talking heads in the media were saying they should do. ”
        
        I think PB is right. A party wanting to stay in power and achieve anything has to look at the polls, but National failed to do that.
        
        6 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:53am
  - marcw
    
    You forget (or ignore) the fact that National’s first priority was to get the economy back into surplus in the face of what they were facing: the GFC, and multiple natural and industrial disasters. And 10 years of future deficits thanks to Cullen.
    
    They did that (got us into a financial position the envy of the Western world), and when we were in a position for everyone to take the benefits, our underclass aided and abetted by our socialist media, went for the biggest bribes.
    
    Haha, serves you all right … your grandchildren will wonder what the F#@k you were thinking. A COL to put us back into square one.
    
    9 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 12:07pm
- Scott
  
  I agree with that. As the poet Yeats once said – ” The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.”
  
  Labour just get on and go full bore and implement all their policies straight away. National tinker with the marginal tax rate, put in a few Charter schools and manage the economy reasonably well.
  
  But all the time the new labour entitlements are left untouched – “working for families is still there”. The most egregious was the anti-smacking legislation which 87% of New Zealanders opposed but National left untouched. During John Key’s term gay marriage was brought in, the whole transsexual revolution was untouched by the government and it goes on and on.
  
  Unfortunately National just don’t care about these incredibly bad social changes that the left bring in. Or if they do care they lack the courage to fight. For national as long as they can manage the economy reasonably well they think they have done a good job.
  
  But here is the thing. There is not enough dollars anywhere for the welfare state to compensate for the destruction of the family and the social anarchy which will follow.
  
  National needs to get back to its core principles, like defending our New Zealand way of life and defending the family. But to do that they need a leader of courage and conviction.
  
  18 3
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:01am
  - calendar girl
    
    … but National did conduct a referendum on the NZ flag!
    
    7 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:16am
    - Shaun the Sheep
      
      I remind you that Little said the flag needed changing, but wouldn’t spend the money on a referendum (ie. Consultation)
      By now, we could well have a new flag chosen for us.
      
      Is that a good thing, or not?
      
      6 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 11:44am
  - Classic Liberal
    
    “gay marriage was brought in” I think most Kiwis did support that and it hasn’t suddenly destroyed the family.
    
    I agree with much of what you wrote, but gay marriage is no big destroyer. I know several wonderful, loyal gay couples and am glad they can be together.
    
    I think National only managed to stay in for 9 years and do well in the last election *because* they have been steady and moderate. I would never vote for a party that tried to make gay marriage illegal again.
    
    9 7
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:16am
    - Scott
      
      Gay marriage was not actually supported by the majority of New Zealanders. Kevin Hague made that clear in a debate on the subject at the Masterton town Hall when he was asked about why should we not have a referendum on the subject and he answered “minorities do not do well in referendums”.
      
      Gay marriage had nothing to actually do with enhancing marriage, most liberal leftists don’t actually believe in marriage. It had everything to do with enhancing gay rights.
      
      The difficulty is that all these social changes undermine the best way to raise children which is Mum and dad in a permanent committed relationship, i.e. marriage, looking after their children. We have lost that and we pay the price with thousands of children being brought up in unstable family units, often without the guidance of their biological father.
      
      We pay the price with millions of dollars on welfare supporting unstable family units. The national government if they had spent any time promoting actual marriage might have done some good. But they didn’t want to promote actual marriage, that would be too controversial to the left. So they went along with the left and bought in the travesty that is gay marriage. They didn’t believe in gay marriage but they just went along with it.
      
      That’s what national and the centre-right appear to do. They just go along with the leftist agenda.
      
      5 6
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:36am
      - Classic Liberal
        
        “children being brought up in unstable family units, often without the guidance of their biological father.”
        
        I totally agree that only stable couples should even think about having children. I don’t agree that allowing gay marriage is much of an issue in that regard.
        
        Here’s what I want to see: no more single parent benefits for new mothers after 9 months. Meaning that if you’re a woman pregnant right now you will have help, but don’t even dream of getting pregnant now, unless you’re in a proper relationship, can support yourself or can get help from family/friends or other help.
        
        11 1
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:01am
    - PhilBest
      
      Think carefully about what you would prefer. Short-term governments that reverse what their predecessors did, each time – or 9-year “moderate” administrations that change nothing the socialists and progressives actually get cracking and do in their time each time?
      
      What is the difference after 30 years?
      
      8 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:37am
      - Manolo
        
        Hear, hear.
        A reason why Labour lite’s approach is doomed.
        
        7 1
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:50am
    - treadingthemill
      
      I would never vote for a party that tried to make gay marriage illegal again.
      
      Neither would I, and neither would most Kiwis. And any party which did would be chucked out at the very next election.
      
      6 4
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:45am
      - Scott
        
        Why is gay marriage such a big deal for you? It’s a big deal for religious conservatives like me because it’s against God’s law and is an abomination unto God.
        But why do you care so much about gay marriage? What have gay people ever done for you?
        
        3 10
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:01am
      - Classic Liberal
        
        “it’s against God’s law and is an abomination unto God.”
        
        I don’t think churches are forced to do gay marriage. It’s just a state arrangement, ensuring legal rights regarding inheritance etc.
        
        What gay friends have done for me: been good, loyal friends and helped me in many ways.
        
        Would you like these now middle aged/elderly men living quietly in their relationships, who are good citizens and good neighbors, to be alone and miserable? Or to ruin a woman’s life by trying to be in a hetero relationship?
        
        8 3
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:09am
      - treadingthemill
        
        @ Scott
        
        Why is gay marriage such a big deal for you?
        
        I believe that people who are different sexually to me should have the same rights as me. I believe that two people who love each other and want to marry should have the right and freedom to do so. I think it’s a matter of justice.
        
        It’s a big deal for religious conservatives like me because it’s against God’s law and is an abomination unto God.
        
        Oh. Then I am your worst nightmare! Google my nick.
        
        But why do you care so much about gay marriage? What have gay people ever done for you?
        
        Two people in my family are gay, and I have gay friends. I love them, and want them to be happy and have the freedom to live their lives in a way that makes them happy and fulfilled.
        
        10 2
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:20am
      - Scott
        
        But it’s not just! Marriage has always been between a man and a woman, for ever, from the beginning of time. That’s what marriage is, a lifelong union between a man and a woman. To give the right to marriy to men and men and women and women changes marriage beyond all recognition.
        
        And the fact of the matter is that people are just not getting married anymore. We need to concentrate on actual marriage because that is the bedrock of our civilisation and any civilised society.
        
        That’s how we raise the next generation in marriage.
        
        By calling the union of a man and a man marriage is ridiculous. By definition that union cannot bear children and cannot bear fruit. Don’t you see it changes everything?
        
        4 13
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:44am
      - treadingthemill
        
        @ Scott
        
        Marriage has always been between a man and a woman, for ever, from the beginning of time.
        
        Things change. Just because something has always been done a certain way does not mean it should continue to be done that way. Otherwise, by your definition, slavery would be just simply because it was always practiced. And marriage has never been static in the way you claim. Polygamy for example, and not that long ago in the Western world marriages had nothing much to do with love, they were arranged by the families for economic reasons. It was also not uncommon for girls to be married at 13, 14 or 15. And even if there was no marriage rite, many cultures in the past were tolerant of gay relationships.
        
        Don’t you see it changes everything?
        
        I don’t see that it changes things as much as you do, but even if it did, I would not care. Because I do believe that change is a matter of justice. And justice is not determined by what has always been done, otherwise slavery would be just for that reason. I can see that from a Christian fundamentalist pov this is a big deal, but I’m not concerned with what your god says.
        
        8 2
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:57am
      - Ed Snack
        
        But why does it have to be “marriage” as such. Homosexual people already had exactly the same rights as everyone had, to marry. I think the opposition to homosexual people living in a relationship is effectively close to zero; except maybe the most fundamental of Christians or any devout Islamic person. Not sure about other religions.
        
        So why chose the label marriage except to cause as much offence as possible ? And believe me, don’t even think of trying to claim you are married as a same sex couple if you ever visit anywhere in the Middle East except in Israel. You will not have a pleasant experience.
        
        2 6
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:26pm
      - Fletch
        
        I believe that people who are different sexually to me should have the same rights as me. I believe that two people who love each other and want to marry should have the right and freedom to do so.
        
        Does that include those wanting to marry family members? Underage people? You said two, but what about more than two if they all love each other? Society rightly has proscriptions on who can marry and “love” is not a criterion that is used to decide. The mere presence of a desire is not enough reason for something to be validated or encouraged.
        
        As Tina Turner sang, “what’s love got to do with it”?
        
        2 6
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:28pm
      - Scott
        
        No, treading the mill, you just don’t care. And that is my point. Liberals and leftist did not care about marriage. They don’t care if it is destroyed. The only thing they care about is gay rights and that is the whole point of gay marriage.
        
        So the liberals and leftists were lying when they said they were concerned about marriage. Because they don’t care about marriage.
        
        1 5
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:44pm
      - treadingthemill
        
        @ Fletch
        
        Does that include those wanting to marry family members? Underage people? You said two, but what about more than two if they all love each other?
        
        I was speaking of consenting adults. The family members thing is a bit tricky, if children are going to be involved, probably no. As far as anymore than two goes, I don’t see any valid reasons for restricting the number.
        
        4 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 2:14pm
      - treadingthemill
        
        No, treading the mill, you just don’t care.
        
        I do care, just not in the same way you do. I care about gay people being happy and having the same rights as me and everyone else.
        
        And that is my point. Liberals and leftist did not care about marriage. They don’t care if it is destroyed.
        
        We don’t care about your definition of marriage, that does not mean we don’t care about marriage at all. You can’t destroy marriage, and allowing gay marriage does not stop Christians getting married, so how is it destroyed? Nobody is saying you, and other Christians that agree with you, can’t choose to define marriage the way you want and practice it. So nothing is being destroyed. It just means you can’t force everyone else to agree with you.
        
        What I don’t care about is your god or your religious beliefs. Why should I, or anyone else, be forced by the state to agree with them? Because that is the underlying element in your position. You want to force your religion upon me and the rest of the country. We don’t do that in New Zealand, that’s what Muslim countries do. New Zealand is a secular democracy.
        
        5 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 2:24pm
      - Fletch
        
        We don’t care about your definition of marriage, that does not mean we don’t care about marriage at all.
        
        Well that’s the whole point, isn’t it? These new laws are based around “the redefinition of marriage”. That is even what some of the bills pushing for gay marriage were named. So how can you “redefine” something and still have it be the same thing? Short answer: you can’t. Redefining marriage to include same-sex couples changes it from marriage into something else, in the same way that allowing girls to join the Boy Scouts means it is not the Boy Scouts any more.
        
        Marriage was always based upon the organic reality of the relationship between a man and a woman. The Govt didn’t invent it; it only recognizes something that has always existed; therefore, they can’t redefine it, either.
        
        Even Hillary Clinton acknowledged this reality of marriage before she “evolved” (read: changed her viewpoint for political expediency).
        
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I1-r1YgK9I
        
        0 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 7:00pm
- PhilBest
  
  Well said, Labrator, Tom Hunter, Brett68, Scott.
  
  Kiwibloggers will know, me too.
  
  Just keep the government seats warm for the socialists next onslaught, don’t try and fight the fake news media, seek approval at all costs, above all don’t even think about principles or red lines.
  
  I keep asking KB-ers who endorse this “win elections, don’t even try and win arguments” approach; what is your red line? Once upon a time it APPEARED to be WFF; it appeared to be the anti smacking law; it appeared to be the air strike wing, it appeared to be the CAGW scam, it appeared to be Council urban planning, it appeared to be wasting money on train sets. What, really, is it? How can I trust you not to be actually enacting the socialists water tax, raising petrol taxes to fund more train sets, lowering the age of consent, or enforcing Tranny’s rights to bathrooms of their choice, sometime in another few years?
  
  15 4
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:23am
  - PhilBest
    
    Or opening the borders to everyone the UN says is a “refugee”, and prosecuting anyone who objects to rape epidemics and terrorism spiking thanks to those “refugees” committing it?
    
    13 2
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:26am
  - tom hunter
    
    /shrugs shoulders/
    
    Sure, but as others have argued with you Phil, you can’t deny the political success of Key. Not just three terms but with an increasing share of the vote, which I’ve never heard of for a three-term government.
    
    Key simply cashed in on what the majority of New Zealanders think/feel/believe.
    
    We’re not Americans; our standard response to any problem is, What’s the government going to do about it?, reinforced by 100+ years of thinking like that (none more so than “right-wingers”), plus the sense of our ourselves as virtuous about nature and the environment (hence the success of shaming in that area), plus our decades-long history of low wages and low productivity leading to so many people being dependent on the state – including no small proportion of the righteous middle-class.
    
    Aside from the systems breaking down, as they came close to doing under Muldoon, and/or vast societal pressures – which we may be seeing via the ongoing rush of technology atomising our jobs, media, business (and government control??) – we’re not going to see this change.
    
    Sorry to say it, but you’re pushing shit uphill. Or to put it more elegantly:
    
    “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
    But in ourselves, that we are underlings.”
    
    6 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:33am
    - PhilBest
      
      Did Kiwis really believe in all that stuff when Don Brash nearly won office in 2005 on a platform including abolition of Maori Seats, abolition of the Iwi Mafia, abolition of urban growth boundaries, significant revision of the RMA, school funding following the child to the school of the parents choice, and so on?
      
      It is a self-fulfilling prophecy, to say that “oh well Kiwis don’t believe in this stuff anyway”. In one more generation, no-one will, if you join the enemy in virtue-signalling against it, like Vichy endorsing the Nazis program so they could claim they hadn’t actually lost a war.
      
      7 4
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:42am
      - treadingthemill
        
        Did Kiwis really believe in all that stuff when Don Brash nearly won office
        
        Nearly winning is not winning. All Brash did was regain National voters. He failed to convince enough centrist swing voters to get on board. So he lost. A losing strategy is till a losing strategy even if your nearly win. And people’s views have changed since then. Another Brash in charge of National would only guarantee more losing.
        
        8 3
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:52am
      - tom hunter
        
        nearly
        
        Key word that (no pun intended). And as we saw in the following years, many of those same voters went for Key even as he dumped those policies.
        
        So how much did they really care about them? Which leads on to your other point…
        
        It is a self-fulfilling prophecy, to say that “oh well Kiwis don’t believe in this stuff anyway”. In one more generation, no-one will,
        
        Not “no-one”, but again not-enough, and not in one more generation but in this one.
        
        Look, I admire your passion and will agree with you and make some of the same points on some issues, but I have no intention of wasting my time arguing with people about their poor choices – although I won’t refrain from having fun by pointing out the failures and stupidities of their ideas, especially when put into practice.
        
        As long as New Zealanders get much of their stuff for “free” (especially the hidden stuff) and think the cost can be dumped on to someone else, all the logic, rationality, and philosophy in the world is not going to change them. For all the talk about “poor” people voting for Key I’ve been amused at the number of Lefties who were just giddy over Me Too, even as she’s screwed the system over the years to build a position of income and wealth that likely exceeds theirs, like any good little Dacha owner.
        
        Just look at this debate as an example: few upticks or downticks, and tribal National voters like Flipper jeering the whole thing as “boring”.
        
        Brilliant isn’t it! 🙂
        
        3 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 12:26pm
  - Manolo
    
    Well said, sir!
    
    2 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:52am
- btb
  
  The Key government was expert at incrementalism the best thing you could say about it, was nobody noticed any changes as they happened so slowly. Unfortunately Chinese capital is hard to hide as is mass immigration and a massively distorted housing market, and no roads or trains. But this probably isn’t why they Nats were turfed out. In my opinion the Nats had to go because they don’t share well. This will have to change if they are to return to government. They will have to court other parties and make policy compromises, they will never get 51% of the party vote. If they made some acknowledgement that they are responsible for the housing crisis they might earn some trust back. If they did this I could easily see some other smaller parties look to them for a deal at the next election, but if they don’t they could get 49% of the party vote and they will still be dead in the water. MMP means you HAVE to compromise.
  
  1 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 12:49pm
JasonJohns

alt right cuckservatives are saying a civil war will begin on saturday…don’t they know we’ve been battling the haitian invasion of the waikato for 21 days? found a headless body at the point at ngaruawahia last night…quite shocking, when i reflected on it

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/01/far-right-conspiracy-theory-us-civil-war
3 15
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:22am
- softail 1450
  
  J J, with some of the crap you come out with are you sure that headless body isn’t you ?
  
  14 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:34am
Paulus

Am delighted to understand, from the Washington Post subsidiary, the Auckland Herald that after 5 days is power that the Coalition has solved the Auckland House problem.
Look forward to this being the case in the next two days for the rest of the Country.
Next will be the national fuel “Levy” hikes . Understand now it is at least 10c plus GST in Auckland. Goff acknowledged this two days ago.
Wow it is only five days – my heart is racing that the world has been settled in such a short time – thanks Heather, Helen and Cinderella.
20 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:22am
- Maxx
  
  Prediction: Regional fuel levies will be adopted by at least 80% of councils within 2 years and we will see these steady increasing year on year at a minimum of twice the rate of inflation.
  
  17 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:32am
- VicParking
  
  The housing report was till September this year and already ‘Liebour supporters’ are calling it a win for the new government.
  
  11 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:45am
  - flipper
    
    Stuff has a piece this morning that will earn the editors a harsh rebuke from the dyke Simpson – they quote two sources in the property sales area saying that foreign buyers dropped away the moment they were required to have a local bank account and an IRD number. One says the number of foreign enquiries has dropped to about 1% and the “sweet spot” price is down to about $650,000. And that there is no housing crisis.
    On the question of foreign buyers, one said: “That horse bolted two years ago – foreign buyers dropped away the moment they were required to have a local bank account and an IRD number [paraphrased]”.
    So, all the smoke and mirrors produced by the Peters/Ardern Regime in relation to house sales and FTAs, is just socialist smoke and mirrors. Worth reading the full piece.
    
    20 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:20am
    - Classic Liberal
      
      And National were too lazy/stupid/whatever to *fight* those lies in the MSM before the election. Didn’t keep emphasizing that ‘homelessness’ in NZ doesn’t just mean living in your car or under a bridge, for instance.
      
      4 1
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:33am
      - tom hunter
        
        Sounds like you won’t be a contributor to Mr Joyce’s “Fighting Fund” then?
        
        ROFLMAO.
        
        0 1
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:35am
softail 1450

Unemployment is at its lowest level since 2008, OMG jacinda has only been in power for a week and she has transformed our economy already .
Damn ,I’m starting to wish I had voted for her.
29 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:26am
- VicParking
  
  Dont forget the dollars dead cat bounce this morning.
  
  6 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:46am
Brito

The Three Strikes and You’re Out Law will be history by June next year. According to the bleeding hearts it is too similar to the US model.

My understanding is that the US consider any criminal act on the 3rd strike a felony and then lock you up for life. Up until then they are lesser charges (in the main – misdemeanour). I read about one individual who stole food from a child and in doing so, under their law, carried out a felony…life in prison.

The bleeding hearts in NZ forget that the three strikes law targets the high end of crime – murder, rape, aggravated robbery. So these folk are allowed to hack and maim their way across the country three times before they are restrained indefinitely.

One day one of these characters will visit their charms upon a bleeding heart and only then will they ‘get it’.
22 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:29am
- Paulus
  
  Thought I read that Winston will not let this Three Strikes cancellation change pass.
  
  7 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 10:18am
  - Classic Liberal
    
    LOL, how can we every trust a single word Winnie says?
    
    9 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:35am
    - UrbanNeocolonialist
      
      Easy if you have memory problems requiring institutionalisation like many of his voters.
      
      4 1
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 11:35am
  - Brito
    
    Winston is fishing up in the Kermadec Reserve so this won’t bother him at all.
    
    4 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 11:24am
Digmen1

National really need to take a lesson from Jacinda.
Labour seem to be wiping out every bit of good National did in 9 years in 9 months.

When National get back in, they need to do the same. And then promote the facts on how they are working.

Lets undo this!
30 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:31am
- Maxx
  
  They should come out now and say that they will reverse the free tertiary education and retrospectively invoice everyone who received it. The next step is to not say anything again until they are elected, enact the policy and say that we said that we would do this when it was enacted. Seems to work for Labour.
  
  18 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:35am
  - SPC
    
    Still lying about that. If they truly imitate Labour they would have to include it in their 2020 manifesto, as Labour did their policies in 2017.
    
    0 11
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 8:38am
    - SPC
      
      Ending Hobbit Law in manifesto 2017.
      
      http://www.labour.org.nz/workplace_relations_policy
      
      Labour said they would get rid of three strikes in their 2017 manifesto.
      
      https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/nzlabour/pages/8485/attachments/original/1505175899/Justice_Manifesto.pdf?1505175899
      
      https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/94965404/labour-promises-to-scrap-national-standards-and-review-ncea-if-in-government
      
      3 4
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 9:17am
- PhilBest
  
  “Let’s undo this”….
  
  But but but but but…. Kimbo and everyone else who has been frantically downticking my criticisms of St John Key’s 9 years of “NOT undoing this” or anything else, are petrified that they might have lost an election as a result!
  
  9 3
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:29am
  - treadingthemill
    
    are petrified that they might have lost an election as a result!
    
    Well, I can only speak for myself, not Kimbo or the others, but I see no evidence of any support for hard right economic policies in New Zealand. ACT is on less than one percent for that reason, and even in their heyday they never managed much more than New Zealand First. And I see even less evidence for any kind of Christian conservative policies. If you wish to govern the country, it does not make any sense to adopt policies that will make that goal unlikely or impossible. If National were to adopt the kinds of policies you and some others want the result would likely be New Zealand First replacing National as the main alternative for non-Labour voters.
    
    So I think Phil that your real problem is not the National party, but the New Zealand people. Bashing National for understanding reality is to miss the point. That point is, where is the electoral support for your policies? It’s not there. So unless you have a strategy for converting well over 2 million people or so to your political views, National, and the New Zealand public, are going to leave you perpetually disappointed. A strategy for converting those millions is your only path forward. And as far as I can tell, neither you nor your fellow travelers have one.
    
    4 4
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:35am
    - PhilBest
      
      And why did Don Brash’s 40% or so in 2005, become 1 percent?
      
      When all your “leaders” start “leading” according to the same sheet of principles, regardless of the traditional side of politics they have been on, that is a powerful endorsement, likely to produce results. Probably only 1% of French under Vichy were really in The Resistance, too. But with actual enemy uniforms and jackboots imposing their program, versus your “own” team doing it for them and presenting an appearance of “honour” because the other side is really the wave of the future and who are we to stand in its way….? With actual enemy uniforms and jackboots, people are that much clearer and ready to rebel.
      
      We even have our Petain – Jim Bolger.
      
      2 4
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:49am
      - treadingthemill
        
        And why did Don Brash’s 40% or so in 2005, become 1 percent?
        
        Time. People change, their views change, younger generations come up with different views. Time is your enemy.
        
        When all your “leaders” start “leading” according to the same sheet of principles
        
        You assume too much power and influence from political leaders. We are a democracy. Leaders don’t lead in the way that you’re assuming, they are led by the people. Leaders change or moderate their policies based on where most people in the electorate are in their views and opinions. A leader who led in the way you’re suggesting would be turfed out after one term, and whatever policies they implemented would be reversed.
        
        We even have our Petain – Jim Bolger.
        
        Bolger simply responded to the electoral backlash against Ruthenomics. Had he not done so Labour would have won the next election, likely in a landslide, and reversed everything anyway. And while National limped on in coalition with New Zealand First, the backlash did in the end destroy them and gave Labour nine years under Helen Clark. So we are back to your basic problem. The majority of voters don’t support your policies, and no leader, no matter how strong, is going to change that. Ever. New Zealand is not and never will be the USA. There is simply no appetite for the policies you favour. Unless over 2 million people in New Zealand become fundamentalist Christians or libertarians in the next few decades, you’re tilting at windmills.
        
        4 4
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:10am
      - Kimbo
        
        @ Philbest
        
        And why did Don Brash’s 40% or so in 2005, become 1 percent?
        
        In 2005 he won back the usually rock solid support of the largely moderate/pragmatic right National voters which is about 35-40%…who in the unusual situation of the 2002 election, when it was clear Clark was going to win, imploded and defected to the likes of United Future and NZ First for the tactical purpose of putting a hand-break on her and a potential coalition with the Greens.
        
        You also overlook that in heading right in 2004-05, Brash in effect neutered National’s only right wing coalition partner, ACT. Before the 2005 election they had 9 seats, after Brash moved into their space they had only 2 – and have been on Epsom electorate life-support ever since.
        
        Bottomline – there is not a large hard right base on which to draw to win elections in NZ. Blame the politicians who fail to try to sell that message all you want. The real issue is…most voters reject it. And have in NZ ever since…the election of the Liberals in 1891. That;s when your supposed “Vichy” started!
        
        5 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 12:51pm
      - Scott
        
        I think Phil Best is absolutely correct. On the right we have very good people but they are just too afraid to stand for any convictions. On the left we have bad people but they have passionate intensity about bad things.
        Going back to gay marriage, there was not electoral support for gay marriage when the bill was introduced. But it was passed because of a vocal leftist minority, aided and abetted by a hopelessly biased media and with the support of a supine group on the right who could not see that the destruction of our traditional values is an important matter.
        
        On the right they just want to surrender. If National had held the line we would not have gay marriage today. And that would be just. Because gay marriage is a wrong thing and it destroys and devalues actual marriage.
        
        But the point is that the right has no fight. On this and any other issue. The only thing they care about is managing the economy reasonably competently and lowering marginal tax rates. The rest they don’t care about.
        
        Look at immigration and the sea change we have had there. One reason for Labour and New Zealand first support has been their promise to lower immigration. The change in attitude about immigration has been led by one Donald J Trump who was the only politician to put his head above the parapet and speak out about it.
        
        I actually think New Zealand is a Conservative country of ordinary people who just want to get on with their lives led by the nose by a leftist liberal elite who secretly despise them.
        
        1 4
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:40pm
      - treadingthemill
        
        @ Scott
        
        On the right we have very good people but they are just too afraid to stand for any convictions.
        
        They have convictions. They are just not your convictions.
        
        Going back to gay marriage, there was not electoral support for gay marriage when the bill was introduced.
        
        No, that’s not the case. There was majority support for gay marriage, at around 50 to 60%. You can check for yourself here:
        
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_New_Zealand#Opinion_polls
        
        I actually think New Zealand is a Conservative country
        
        The reality is that New Zealand is a moderately conservative and moderately liberal country. We are very centrist, and we don’t like extremes of left or right, which is why we don’t usually get them, and when we do there is always a backlash.
        
        4 1
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:53pm
    - wiseowl
      
      One thing that annoys me is this continual connection (in New Zealand commentaries) of religion with conservatives.
      It is a nonsense.
      What is happening in New Zealand is being mirrored in Australia currently .The likes of Cory Bernadi is proud to stand up as a conservative but that doesn’t mean he is a religious nutter or have extreme right views.
      Turnbull is behaving the same as Key and is slowly losing more and more support.There is going to be a major shift to the Conservatives and One Nation in Australia and before we can build on the same here.
      At the present time National don’t get it.
      
      6 1
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 11:50am
      - Scott
        
        Wise owl – agree with you up to a point. I do think New Zealand is basically Conservative country. However the idea that religious people are nutters is a sad mischaracterisation. Having religious faith is widespread throughout the world. Indeed religious faith is positively correlated with good mental health.
        
        I think the difficulty is that the media seizes on the fact that someone goes to church and immediately condemns them as a fundamentalist nut job or some such title.
        
        However conservatism does have this philosophical base. That there is a body of transcendent truths. Unlike liberalism which embraces everything changing, conservatism believes that some things are true. And hopefully without you choking on your sandwiches – transcendent truth is normally associated with God.
        
        1 3
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:51pm
- DifferentPerspective
  
  I’m glad to see you get up-ticked for this Digimen1.
  
  Just a few days ago, I enjoyed a veritable blizzard of downticks for suggesting exactly the same.
  
  Hopefully this means the two ticks blue rinse brigade on here are coming out of their denial of the massive wasted opportunity that was 2008-17 by ~~National~~ Labour Lite.
  
  2 6
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:34am
  - SPC
    
    And if the consequence is to risk defeat after one term, rather than three, so be it.
    
    Go for it, and let everyone know about it.
    
    Guarantee this lot a few terms first.
    
    3 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:44am
Simon

Less than a week into the job, new Housing and Transport Minister Phil Twyford has asked MBIE, the Transport Ministry and Treasury for advice on 20 different streams of work to kick off a mass planning programme to enable the building of tens of thousands of affordable homes and a transport network that can handle more than a million extra people.

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2017/10/31/57399/how-to-pay-for-an-uncongested-auckland

Million extra people. Labo is planning to increase the population of Auckland by a million.

This looks to be the plan. Stall immigration for now, get all the tax ducks lined up, start pissing away money and then open door immigration.
16 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:32am
- PhilBest
  
  The projections already are for a million. It all depends on the date it is to happen “by”. If anything it will come later under Labour’s policy. Where was National superior on this particular issue? At least Labour seem to have beliefs about not letting infrastructure and housing deficits just bank up and up and up.
  
  But of course I will criticise them just as fiercely if they stuff it up. I am only criticising National on principle after having criticised Helen in her day – because if Helen deserved it, why doesn’t National as the problem has got even worse on 9 years of their watch?
  
  5 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:33am
fernglas

“Labour MP Stuart Nash has dismissed criticism of him by senior minister Steven Joyce for marching and speaking at an anti-TPP rally in Napier, one of more than 20 protests across the country that attracted 25,000 people by organisers’ counts.

Mr Nash was one of at least six Labour MPs who took part in nationwide marches on Saturday, as was Labour’s trade spokesman, David Parker, who spoke at the Dunedin rally. Others were Phil Twyford, Ruth Dyson, Megan Woods, and Clare Curran, while Jacinda Ardern apologised for her absence.”

Hypocrisy or realism?
15 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:49am
SPLOOGE

2 weeks on and still no sign of the sky falling in.
I think we should all unite behind our new and quite wonderful Prime Minister Jacinda Arden.
3 32
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:50am
- Longknives
  
  “Comrades,Comrades,Comrades”
  “Capitalism has Failed!”
  
  Yeah- Just Wonderful..
  
  19 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:05am
- Jack5
  
  Splooge, in your attack on DG yesterday, you showed yourself nothing more than a cowardly Leftist troll. Fuck off back to the Standard.
  
  27 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:08am
  - flipper
    
    Jack5….
    I do not agree with many of DG’s views on criminal punishment, but I recognise and defend his right to advocate his views. I want to hear him. If we do not have the benefit of those views we cannot make informed decisions.
    So fuck off splooge.
    ****
    BTW….
    Does anyone have any info on the outcome of the 3 strike matter that went [memory hazy] to the SC ?????
    
    7 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:48am
    - SPC
      
      It got as far as the Court of Appeal.
      
      https://www.pundit.co.nz/content/three-strikes-and-you-still-get-out
      
      http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/comment/editorials/86893859/editorial-the-first-threestrikes-case-shows-what-a-poor-law-this-is
      
      1 6
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:12am
- Captain Mainwaring
  
  If you want to praise her at least learn to spell her name, idiot.
  ARDERN.
  
  14 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:08am
  - Digmen1
    
    I thought it was Keys.
    
    3 5
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:24am
- Tarquin North
  
  Have you been drinking this morning?
  
  7 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:09am
  - fernglas
    
    Yes. I was lead to it by you’re mate Keys, Mike Hoskings and this Adeern person, aye.
    
    8 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:05am
- DifferentPerspective
  
  2 weeks and Labour is already 400 houses behind their target number of new affordable homes.
  
  18 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:36am
- UrbanNeocolonialist
  
  Au contraire.
  Business confidence has plummeted, which means there will be little new hiring, reduced investment, and soon increasing unemployment.
  NZD down sharply as markets judge our economic prospects to be bad under new govt. This will leak to interest rates rises, housing price falls and higher inflation.
  There will be a recession in 2018.
  
  12 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:47am
- Rachael Membery
  
  ArdeRn, if you are going to splooge, can you please get the ‘object’ of your affections name right?
  
  5 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 11:58am
- Fletch
  
  It took a few years for Socialism to destroy Venezuela…. Funny how Bernie Sanders doesn’t tout it as a success story any more.
  
  3 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 1:39pm
Rodney Randall

https://youtu.be/2mKWWQWLne4

The Truth About The Nyc Terror Attack
Paul Joseph Watson.
7 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:52am
Jack5

The Telegraph, unfortunately behind its pay wall, has a great, detailed obituary of one of NZ’s best soldiers: Major-General Sandy Thomas.

I hope the surviving print media in NZ pick this up.
7 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 9:10am
- billr
  
  here you go:
  
  https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/98205054/obituary-sandy-thomas-one-of-the-most-decorated-war-heroes-and-immense-new-zealander
  
  4 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:39am
  - Jack5
    
    Thanks Billr!
    
    That’s an interesting obituary, but not as thorough or as interesting as the long Telegraph article.
    
    3 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:42am
    - RalphT
      
      Yes, thanks billr. A fine record and one we should be proud of.
      
      2 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:24am
Stars And Stripes

Some general advisories issued by the authorities this morning in preparation for the Tonga vs Samoa league match in Hamilton on Saturday.
“Commuters southbound on the Waikato Expressway can expect severe delays due to large concentrations of slow moving bongo vans especially in the fast lanes.
Vigilance is advised as visibility is expected to be poor due to excessive emissions of diesel fumes and other pollutants.
Congestion is expected also around the Huntly area especially in the vicinity of the KFC drive through and police will also be present in the area in case of a shortage of “big buckets”.
WINZ have also advised that their Huntly branch will be open on Saturday for any emergency benefit applications required for the big game with no pre approval required for purchasers of alcohol and machetes”.
16 3
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 9:12am
Hugh Pavletich

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Posted at … https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2017/11/links-2-november-2017/#comment-2990567 … and … https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2017/11/links-2-november-2017/#comment-2990568

New Zealand’s New Leader Wants to Go Further Than Most to Curb Housing Prices – WSJ … behind paywall …

https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-zealands-new-leader-wants-to-go-further-than-most-to-curb-housing-prices-1509533271

WELLINGTON, New Zealand—With its plan to bar nearly all foreigners from buying existing homes, New Zealand’s new government is taking aim at a group of buyers that it blames for a growing housing-affordability crisis.

Graham Wall, an Auckland-based real-estate agent, fears many of his clients are in the crosshairs … read more via hyperlink above …

How to pay for an uncongested Auckland … Bernard Hickey … Newsroom

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2017/10/31/57399/how-to-pay-for-an-uncongested-auckland

… extract …

Other financing tools

Twyford said the new Government was also pushing ahead with plans for infrastructure bonds serviced by targeted rates in new areas. An infrastructure funding solution was needed before any removal of Metropolitan Urban Limit, which has now become the Rural Urban Growth boundary under the new Unitary Plan.

“It’s that failure of urban growth that’s at the heart of the problems we’ve got with gridlock on the roads and expensive housing. The highly restrictive planning system and the Metropolitan Urban Limit is the sharp end of that, but also infrastructure financing is critical,” he said.

“The thing with the Metropolitan Urban Limit is you’ve got to fix the infrastructure financing first because the rural urban boundary is a proxy for the line between land that has infrastructure and land that doesn’t.

“I want to tackle those two things together and I want to build on the work done by the former Government with special purpose vehicles, but we need to take it a lot further. What we need is a pipeline of finance that is available for the infrastructure for new urban developments.

“You can’t rely on the minister rocking up every six months and writing a cheque. That’s not a sustainable way to do it. You’ve got to be able to tap into debt finance. Make it available for developments that get the tick in terms of quality and reticulation, serviced by a targeted rate on the properties in a new development.”

Twyford acknowledged that any system for infrastructure bonds issued by new authorities such as Municipal Utility Districts (MUDs), which are used in the United States to raise finance for suburban infrastructure, had to ensure that ratings agencies saw them as separate from Councils.

“Critically you’ve got to solve the question of where that debt sits and on whose balance sheet,” he said.

Housing – New Zealand Labour Party

http://www.labour.org.nz/housing

… extract …

Remove barriers that are stopping Auckland growing up and out

Labour will remove the Auckland urban growth boundary and free up density controls. This will give Auckland more options to grow, as well as stopping landbankers profiteering and holding up development. New developments, both in Auckland and the rest of New Zealand, will be funded through innovative infrastructure bonds.
4 34
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 9:17am
- Hugh Pavletich
  
  Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
  A LITTLE HISTORY …
  
  … August 2017 report …
  
  Most baby boomers want younger generation on the housing ladder | Stuff.co.nz
  
  https://i.stuff.co.nz/business/96096009/most-baby-boomers-want-younger-generation-on-the-housing-ladder
  
  Baby boomers are concerned younger New Zealanders cannot afford their first home.
  
  Research by Canstar found 63 per cent of baby boomers worried about younger generations getting on the housing ladder, while only 51 per cent of Generation Y (born in the 1980s and 90s) worried about it.
  
  Baby boomers were also concerned about the housing shortage, with 65 per cent wanting more houses to be built. … read more via hyperlink above …
  
  … March 2017 reports …
  
  It is important too to understand the significance of the then (now Government excluding ACT and United Future) opposition political parties working together within the MMP environment … as illustrated with the RMA amendment legislation back in March (much the same with the HASHA legislation September 2016) … reported by Bernard Hickey of Newsroom soon after …
  
  https://pro.newsroom.co.nz/articles/1629-newsroom-pro-s-8-things-at-8-trolling-millennials-is-easy-defamation-retrials-loom
  
  7. Just in case you missed it…
  
  One curious coda to the RMA debate that concluded last week was that the Opposition parties plus ACT and United Future all voted again during the third reading debate for amendments that would have abolished Rural Urban Growth Boundaries and allowed the financing of infrastructure bonds paid for with targeted rates.
  
  The amendments were defeated by National and the Maori Party.
  
  The irony of a Government that has railed against restrictions on land development by councils voting against removing those restrictions should be noted. And also that the proposal for infrastructure bonds was backed by the right-leaning New Zealand Initiative and voted for by the Greens and Labour. Strange times indeed.
  
  The NZ homeowners who hate high house prices are revealed in Labour polling | Stuff.co.nz
  
  http://i.stuff.co.nz/business/money/90244287/The-NZ-homeowners-who-hate-high-house-prices-are-revealed-in-Labour-polling
  
  3 36
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:19am
  - Hugh Pavletich
    
    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
    Ardern, Robertson and Twyford meet Auckland Mayor Phil Goff to discuss collective action for Auckland housing and transport | interest.co.nz
    
    https://www.interest.co.nz/news/90679/ardern-robertson-and-twyford-meet-auckland-mayor-phil-goff-discuss-collective-action
    
    Latest QV figures show average housing values in Auckland and Christchurch are below where they were 12 months ago; growth slowing in other regions | interest.co.nz
    
    https://www.interest.co.nz/property/90660/latest-qv-figures-show-average-housing-values-auckland-and-christchurch-are-below
    
    3 33
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:31am
    - labrator
      
      Get your own blog. Your predictions are as accurate as your copy pastes are useful.
      
      25 1
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 9:41am
      - Hugh Pavletich
        
        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
        http://www.PerformanceUrbanPlanning.org
        
        3 34
        Report
        November 2, 2017 9:45am
      - Sponge
        
        Well Hugh why don’t you just limit the screeds of shit that no one reads to your blog instead of spamming this one? If the answer is because no one reads your blog then you need to think about why that might be.
        
        You abuse the hospitality of the host here with your mindless copy and paste bullshit.
        
        27 1
        Report
        November 2, 2017 9:56am
      - Hugh Pavletich
        
        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
        Posted at … https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2017/11/links-2-november-2017/#comment-2990680
        
        Above 3 postings on Kiwiblog General Debate today … where the beaten Kiwi Tories (National Party) are extremely grumpy indeed ! …
        
        https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/11/general_debate_2_november_2017.html/comment-page-1#comment-2066335
        
        1 34
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:01am
      - Hugh Pavletich
        
        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
        Sponge … May I respectfully suggest you read the Labour Party housing policies link above.
        
        Like the Tories they seem to actually read my stuff … and in contrast to the Tories … actually follow up with ACTION … IMMEDIATELY.
        
        I am so so tired of wet nursing my fellow Tories since early 2005.
        
        2 32
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:08am
      - Keeping Stock
        
        Now you’re just taking the piss High, as well as abusing DPF’s hospitality.
        
        How would you like it if someone came into your place and crapped all over the carpet?
        
        24 3
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:11am
      - Hugh Pavletich
        
        Keeping Stock … John Key and I were on the same page in 2007 … when he was then listening to what I was saying …
        
        John Key on Housing Reform 2007 – YouTube
        
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWPgoAI1cLE
        
        … and you voted for him in droves in 2008.
        
        Why did he chicken out ?
        
        Has Ardern got what he hasn’t ? A strong character ?
        
        2 28
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:25am
      - Hugh Pavletich
        
        … THE AUSSIES PRAISING NEW NEW ZEALAND PRIME MINISTER JACINDA ARDERN …
        
        Ardern: “We believe that housing is a right” … MacroBusiness Australia
        
        https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2017/11/ardern-believe-housing-right/
        
        https://www.facebook.com/jacindaardern/videos/10154805840237441/
        
        http://www.macrobusiness.com.au
        
        Great stuff from the legend: Here’s why she is spot on, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: At the base of all human well-being is the house: food, water, warmth, rest, security and safety. If your society is not providing that to as many people as possible – especially future children – then, frankly, it’s a failure. … READ AND VIEW MORE via hyperlink above …
        
        1 24
        Report
        November 2, 2017 10:59am
      - Rich Prick
        
        Fucking hell Hugh, give it a bone.
        
        9 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:47am
    - Captain Mainwaring
      
      Count the downticks Hugh and take the hint.
      You’re a bloody parasite on here.
      
      14 2
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:40am
- Paulus Gnome
  
  Fargof
  
  13 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:30am
  - PhilBest
    
    That’s the Mayor of Dorkland’s nickname, what is your point?
    
    3 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 9:46am
Manolo

Execute the bastard:
http://abc7ny.com/officials-nyc-terror-suspect-proud-of-attack/2590824/

New York City terror suspect Sayfullo Saipov was out of surgery Wednesday morning, and is expected to survive after he was shot by NYPD officers during a truck rampage that killed eight people in Lower Manhattan.

Investigators said they were able to talk with Saipov. It’s unclear what, if anything, investigators learned from him. Though, one official told ABC News he was “proud” of the attack.
13 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 9:28am
- UrbanNeocolonialist
  
  He was drunk and doesn’t remember running over all those people, and anyway will be living as a gay man from now on, so just let it go OK?
  
  19 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:32am
- Dave Mann
  
  I don’t think execution is the answer.
  
  The correct response would be to bomb his village/city/town in Uzbekistan with some carefully targeted cruise missiles and then throw him alive from the B52 which delivered them.
  
  Until the west learns to retaliate in ways that the enemy understand and can relate to, attacks like this will just continue and will most likely get worse. It started with airliners…. now their weapon is the simple rental ute.
  
  Why can’t we see that the answer to terror is terror? It’s their own weapon, FFS.
  
  16 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:49am
  - UrbanNeocolonialist
    
    Sippenhaft (kin liability) has been the solution used by every successful/enduring empire in history to stop insurgency. But it probably isn’t something the west will ever be able to bring itself to do (unless maybe nukes or other WMDs are used)
    
    10 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:07am
    - Dave Mann
      
      Yes I think you’re right. The West doesn’t have the courage to do something like this… we feel that we are ‘too civilised to stoop to their level’.
      
      But actually we are wrong, because this enemy needs to be beaten and we are in a fight to the death, although very few in the West realise this and even fewer will come out and acknowledge it.
      
      It is vital that we engage Islam in a meaningful way or we are fucked. We need to understand what they fear most and use it against them and pretending that ‘this has nothing to do with Islam’ and lighting fucking candles and wanking on about the dangers of ‘islamophobia’ ain’t going to do it, frankly.
      
      13 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:39am
      - Dave Mann
        
        My suggestion isn’t merely a visceral knee-jerk reaction (although I admit there’s a little bit of that too)…. but consider this:
        
        If the Muslims knew that an attack like this would bring the immediate destruction of their town, their family and/or their mosque, wouldn’t this modify their behaviour? Wouldn’t they start to examine their own people more closely and stop preaching, encouraging and tolerating terror acts against society?
        
        I mean this in the most caring, inclusive and non-judgemental way. Please don’t misunderstand me. Its just that I’ve run out of candles and I think we should try a different approach.
        
        13 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:16am
  - backster
    
    At the very least they should close down his mosque and confiscate his family’s property.
    
    8 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 11:46am
    - Digmen1
      
      You mean the mosque he goes to in the USA.
      Send his family back to Uzbekistan.
      
      4 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 1:20pm
- PhilBest
  
  I can’t help thinking of the sheer difference, visible in the footage, between real terrorist ram-raiding murders, and what the Left unanimously jumped to condemn as its “equivalent” on the part of a right-winger. I mean in Charlottesville.
  
  James Fields presents every appearance of a panicked driver trying to force his way through a crowd, braking at times, and brought to a stop by stationary cars he couldn’t see (stationary and invisible because of an Antifa blockade, mark you), and his own car being still driveable. As soon as his car stops, masked goons with bats, obviously already pursuing it, come into the frame and start laying into the car, as Fields understandably hits reverse and flees again, backwards this time.
  
  The dead woman in Charlottesville was apparently trapped between the stationary cars. Not one person actually got run “over” by Fields’ own car. Pretty inept ramming murderer, if you ask me. This was not just a footpath or a cycle lane, it was a road full of blockading Antifa. All these Muslim ramming murderers would have killed 30 Antifa protesters minimum plus 100+ injured if they had been at the wheel.
  
  15 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 10:07am
- Odakyu-sen
  
  The US needs to make an example of Saipov.
  
  7 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 10:32am
  - Dave Mann
    
    See my 9.49am comment above and UrbanNeocolonialist’s reply on Sippenhaft (kin liability).
    
    (If you’re as Japanese as your handle suggests, I would think you have a pretty good idea of how the West should respond to atrocities like this, mate).
    
    4 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:51am
    - Odakyu-sen
      
      I am familiar with pre-war Japanese methods, especially the concept of “rentai sekinin.”
      The closest and inadequate English translation is “collective responsibility,” which can’t help but bring a Crocodile Dundee moment to mind.
      “That is not “collective responsibility.” This is
      “collective responsibility!” (Says the Japanese hero, waving his brutal and effective rentai sekinin in the face of the shocked and stunned English-speaking audience…)
      
      Footnote.
      Rentai sekinin is alive and fully operational in contemporary Japan. We don’t like to talk about it, but it’s there when we need it.
      
      6 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 12:18pm
      - Odakyu-sen
        
        A thought about the doctrine of “collective responsibility.” It is anti-Western, anti-Enlightenment and anti-individual.
        
        I can’t think of a more effective approach to dealing with imperialist collectivist ideologies.
        
        After all, in cross-cultural interactions, you need to speak the language your opponent understands, if you want to obtain the outcome you desire.
        
        8 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 12:33pm
      - kowtow
        
        English speaking audience should not be shocked.
        
        Under the Collectives Punishment Ordinance we blew up Arabs houses in Palestine. Something the gubmint there still does.
        
        1 2
        Report
        November 2, 2017 12:34pm
    - Odakyu-sen
      
      When I say “make an example,” I mean that Saipov must be given a fair trial (to be documented and televised) and–should he be found guilty and sane–executed (also to be documented and televised).
      
      Transparency in justice is good.
      
      4 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 12:57pm
      - Twinkletoes
        
        Too easy. Instant martyrdom is what they want, what they don’t want is the rest of their mortal life spent in solitary confinement becoming too old to actively engage in the pleasantries they believe they will find in Paradise.
        
        0 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 3:17pm
      - Odakyu-sen
        
        Twinkletoes,
        
        The purpose would be to show the East and West what kind of man Saipov is, what he believes in, and how the US treats such individuals.
        The purpose is to educate; not to martyr. For this time, the US must prevail in making the case for justice and fairness, to win the world to its cause.
        
        0 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 5:46pm
- kowtow
  
  Trump is trying to keep them out.
  
  He’s called a racist Islamophobe .
  
  Democrats want to keep them coming.
  
  Treachery.
  
  18 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 10:59am
- kowtow
  
  Muslim migrant massacres cyclists and the left wing Guardian has headline accusing Trump of sowing discord. You couldn’t make that up..
  
  “Police try to retrace New York attacker’s moves as Trump sows discord”
  
  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/01/police-try-to-retrace-new-york-attackers-moves-as-trump-sows-discord
  
  14 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 11:17am
  - Inandout
    
    Well at least the Muzzie is heading to Gitmo. I shudder to think what the US would have become if Hillary had won. Thanks Donald.
    
    7 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 12:20pm
Manolo

Meanwhile in NZ the communist Greens want a much higher intake of Muslims:
http://pix11.com/2017/10/31/trump-orders-homeland-security-to-step-up-extreme-vetting-in-wake-of-nyc-terror-attack/
18 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 9:31am
- Jack5
  
  The Coalition government has an MP who has spoken to an activist group that wants to bring deportees back to NZ.
  
  13 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:39am
- DifferentPerspective
  
  Yes – and they want to ramp it up to 5000/year (which means massive numbers by the time the average of 16 dependents per refugee is factored in).
  
  No one ever criticises Japan for their strict no-muslims policy. They have no muslim terrorism, why would we take even the slightest chance that we could have the same “iversity dividends” here of:
  – suicide bombers blowing up little girls at concerts
  – vehicular terrorists
  – widespread grooming gangs
  
  23 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:46am
  - Odakyu-sen
    
    If any would-be Islamic terrorist decided to launch an attack in Japan, he would have an almost unlimited number of soft, unsuspecting, vulnerable targets.
    
    Then Japanese society would close ranks and suppress Islam.
    
    13 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:42am
  - Twinkletoes
    
    It is not just the reunification numbers but the number of children this culture produces, especially when aided by western welfare. Married young, one child per annum – doesn’t take too long to outnumber the locals. Gadaffi’s dream fulfilled in Godzone.
    
    3 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 3:30pm
waikatogirl

Wellington Peace Action group will be holding a vigil outside parliament tonight in support of bringing the entitled illegal immigrants currently on Manus Island to NZ. The overstayers are free to leave after being offered resettlement in PNG, but have barricaded themselves in the facility refusing to leave until Australia take them for resettlement on Australian soil.

Who are these men, why are they there and how come they feel they can jump the immigration queue and demand special treatment?

Stay out of it NZ.
34 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 9:47am
- Rich Prick
  
  Yeah, it sounds like they have a bit of an “attitude” problem. They should fit right in with those vigil fuckwits. Australia/PNG can keep its mystery meat and all of the issues that come with it, we just don’t need it.
  
  8 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:54am
- Jack5
  
  They are the same sort of trash who formed the New Zealand Communist Party back in the day.
  
  They were the world’s stupidest communists. Jumped to Mao when the Soviets began to soften. Then murdering Mao wasn’t purist enough for them so they switched support to Communist Albania.
  
  These folk are sprinkled with lunatic peaceniks of the ilk of those who tried to wreck the electronic spy station in Nelson, and others who sheltered the Algerian Islamic Salvation Front politician who illegally crashed into New Zealand.
  
  20 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:55am
- Digmen1
  
  Its not us – we want to stay out of it.
  
  Its idiot groups like the Wellington Peace Action Group, and other refugee organisations and the Green Party!
  
  Why don’t the Wellington Peace Action Group go to the middle east and sort out some peace there!
  
  19 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:57am
  - fernglas
    
    To take these people when Australia has refused will piss them off mightily, as now there will be new waves of asylum seekers wanting to be accepted into Australia, or if not, New Zealand do they can draw the benefit for three years, get a NZ passport and go to Australia. Keep out of it.
    
    17 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 10:10am
    - Paulus
      
      I would expect that New Zealand via Cindy will be told shortly that from ……all New zealand Passport holders will have to apply for a visa in advance of traveling to Australia.
      THOSE Public Servants in Canberra have been pushing this for many years, certainly back to to 2002 when Clark dropped those there into the poop.
      
      14 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 10:25am
  - flipper
    
    Yep…. and take the idiot greens and dyke Simpson with them !
    
    7 3
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 11:33am
- Inandout
  
  This group, like various ‘peace’ groups before, are communist fronts. It started with the old KGB infiltrating and funding the CND top hierachy in the UK, and their beliefs filtered down to NZ. CND then morphed into Greenpeace, and the rest is history.
  
  5 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 12:31pm
Digmen1

The thing is since Australia put those scum on that island there have been hardly any other refugee boats head to Australia.

So hard action works! People don’t want to pay thousands of dollars to people smugglers to stay in a camp on an island for 10 years!
22 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 10:00am
- PhilBest
  
  Exactly, and “refugee” should be in inverted commas just to make your comment 100% perfect.
  
  Has everyone listened to that Polish MP being interviewed by a snivelling BBC SJW and telling her exactly that:
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLmWZsr5V0U
  
  These people are not refugees. Refugees are, you flee the spot where you are in danger, and wait at the first safe spot you come to, to be processed by the authorised agencies. Travelling thousands of miles, across several borders, is “illegal migrant”, not “refugee”!
  
  19 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 10:14am
- Rachael Membery
  
  Well not that island at any rate.
  
  0 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 7:36pm
- Maggy Wassilieff
  
  At least 1000 people drowned attempting the trip between Indonesia and Australia.
  
  http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/asylum-seekers-drowning-on-our-watch/4916110
  
  0 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:21pm
Stars And Stripes

Hamilton Boys’ High School student injured in girl’s undie prank
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/98467514/hamilton-boys-high-school-student-injured-in-girls-undie-prank
“A high school prank where a teenage girl rode through a boys’ school in her underwear has ended with one student injured.
The rider, who was wearing just underwear and a pair of shoes, is understood to have run over the pupil’s leg during the lunchtime stunt at Hamilton Boys’ High School.
A witness said the girls were topless during the stunt”.

Personally I think the minimum penalty for this kind of sexist degradation of women would be for the students involved to be made to do another ride but this time only with the shoes.
17 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 10:12am
- Steve (North Shore)
  
  Karma for the injured student? A bit of fun taken too far. Maybe next time he will not be such a dick
  
  8 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 10:32am
  - kowtow
    
    He was run over by some dumb bitch on a motor bike.
    Not a prank. She should be charged with gbh.
    
    “A high school student’s leg was “cut to the bone” when he was struck by a schoolgirl in underwear riding a dirt bike in an end of year prank that went horribly wrong.”
    
    https://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/boys-leg-cut-bone-undie-clad-bike-prank
    
    2 5
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 12:22pm
    - Steve (North Shore)
      
      According to the Stuff item, he was trying to knock the girl off the bike
      
      7 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 12:32pm
      - sooty
        
        Darwin was a bit slow.
        
        0 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 12:49pm
      - Stars And Stripes
        
        Whatever the truth of the situation I see the boy and his father have come out and said they are not too worried about the whole situation.
        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11939658
        The only one getting all righteous about it is the female principal who is probably just jealous ultimately that she could not pull this motorbike stunt off because her tits are too saggy and shrivelled.
        
        3 4
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:23pm
      - Steve (North Shore)
        
        Seems that the item on ‘Stuff’ written by Phillipa Yalden has now been reworded. No mention of the student trying to knock the girl off the bike. This is what happens when Stuff create fake news – or is it fake? Cover up one way or the other
        
        5 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:32pm
      - itstricky
        
        The only one getting all righteous about it is the female principal who is probably just jealous ultimately that she could not pull this motorbike stunt off because her tits are too saggy and shrivelled.
        
        Oh, I dunno, you seem to be getting pretty righteous yourself.
        
        What parts of you are saggy and shrivelled?
        
        5 2
        Report
        November 2, 2017 1:52pm
      - Stars And Stripes
        
        Well since you ask itstricky nothing on me is shrivelled but my pockets definitely are on the saggy side.
        This happens when you keep all your wealth to yourself instead of giving it to fictitious nonsense like child poverty and homelessness.
        If more people adopted this position a more humane and just society is just round the corner.
        
        3 3
        Report
        November 2, 2017 2:17pm
- waikatogirl
  
  The closest girls’ school to BHS would be Sacred Heart Catholic Girls’ school. ?
  
  6 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 1:23pm
  - SPC
    
    Not the one of the tits on dirt bikes girls.
    
    Integrated Anglican school, farmers daughters – last century it would have been horses.
    
    3 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 2:37pm
the deity formerly known as nigel6888

Well I hope NZ First are feeling pleased with themselves. Did they vote for all of Helen Clark’s policies back and hard? Really? No national standards, no 3 strike, more refugees, more nanny state, taxes on everything, houses declared “sensitive” assets, and meddling in the economy turned up to 11. Hmmm. My next prediction. Labour is trying to ram their agenda through before Winston wakes up from his nap. Then they will distract us with a referendum on becoming a Republic, then HC will be our last Governor-General and first President. You read it here first. And the sheep that form the populace will chase bright shiny objects like benefit increases (which is what student subsidies really are) and minimum wage increases that strangely enough lead to less jobs, and then tax increases on those other wealthy losers to keep paying for all the trinkets. Not bad for 35% and a nice smile -because lovely Jacinda wasnt one of those evil old socialists was she? oh, bwuhahahaha….!
18 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 10:21am
- waikatogirl
  
  …and the fawning media will say nothing, nada, zero, zip…
  
  3 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 1:25pm
Tauhei Notts

At Melbourne Cup time we see lots of racing interest stories. Stuff have uploaded Sarah McPhee’s (A.A.P.) piece about the French horse Tiberian, the son of a teaser pony, Tiberius Caesar, who has little racing form to his name as he spends his time at stud Haras du Logis stimulating mares before stallion Authorised comes to finish the deed.
A New Zealand racing publication, with a bit more knowledge about smutty breeding topics, changed the word “comes” to “arrives”.
7 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 10:41am
- Longknives
  
  Yep the Breeding Industry use ‘Fluffers’!
  
  As an aside- Watch the NZ Media find any tenuous NZ connection to whatever horse wins the Cup on Tuesday…’The Jockey’s Grandad once visited Auckland’ or something.
  I don’t know why they do that- Sure, celebrate if a Kiwi Horse wins but every year claiming it as a win for NZ is kinda sad and desperate..(Like TV1 claiming Winx as a ‘Kiwi Champ’ the other week)
  
  2 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 12:00pm
Rich Prick

Has anyone seen Winston?
22 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 11:00am
- Dave Mann
  
  I wish I was a good cartoonist. I’d introduce a game called ‘Where’s Winston’ and launch it on Facebook or somewhere. It would take off like a rocket.
  
  Can someone with artistic ability do this please? 😀
  
  17 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 11:25am
  - softail 1450
    
    D M. where the fricking hell is he ? the little shit dropped this crap on us and disappeared
    
    9 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 12:18pm
    - sooty
      
      What like a where’s Wally joke?
      
      1 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 12:51pm
      - Dave Mann
        
        Yes, that’s what I mean 😀
        
        0 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 11:45pm
  - waikatogirl
    
    Will ‘Where’s Winston’ be the one in the double-breasted suit and holding a glass of whisky. ?
    
    5 0
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 1:27pm
    - RF
      
      Melbourne cup next Tuesday so the dwarf will find an excuse to attend at our expense.
      
      3 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 2:49pm
- Flash
  
  I think he’s with Wally.
  
  0 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:49pm
UrbanNeocolonialist

Would love to see an “Refuse Muslim Refugee Immigration” petition launched in NZ to counter all the bullshit petitions calling for more.
17 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 11:47am
- Brito
  
  Set it up and lets get on with it.
  
  8 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 12:41pm
- Longknives
  
  It would be simply ignored by the Government and anyone who signed would be labelled a ‘White Supremacist’ by the Media..
  
  Look at what’s happening in the States right now- You even dare to oppose the destruction of Historical Statues and you are labelled a ‘White Supremacist’!
  
  9 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 12:46pm
softail 1450

vision,
absolutely,
can’t confirm,
priorities,
robust,
unsustainable ,
very clear,
ultimately ,
processes,
efficiencies ,
sustainable
uplift,
contributions,
exploring ,
concepts ,
regional taxes,
this is the sort of tripe goff and ardern were spouting this morning at their love fest meeting about getting their dirty hands on more of everybody else’s cash ,it was gut wrenching bullshit,
we are truly fucked …..
13 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 12:11pm
Rodney Randall

How to pay for an uncongested Auckland … Bernard Hickey … Newsroom

further down page…

Other financing tools

Twyford said the new Government was also pushing ahead with plans for infrastructure bonds serviced by targeted rates in new areas. An infrastructure funding solution was needed before any removal of Metropolitan Urban Limit, which has now become the Rural Urban Growth boundary under the new Unitary Plan.

“It’s that failure of urban growth that’s at the heart of the problems we’ve got with gridlock on the roads and expensive housing. The highly restrictive planning system and the Metropolitan Urban Limit is the sharp end of that, but also infrastructure financing is critical,” he said.

“The thing with the Metropolitan Urban Limit is you’ve got to fix the infrastructure financing first because the rural urban boundary is a proxy for the line between land that has infrastructure and land that doesn’t.

“I want to tackle those two things together and I want to build on the work done by the former Government with special purpose vehicles, but we need to take it a lot further. What we need is a pipeline of finance that is available for the infrastructure for new urban developments.

“You can’t rely on the minister rocking up every six months and writing a cheque. That’s not a sustainable way to do it. You’ve got to be able to tap into debt finance. Make it available for developments that get the tick in terms of quality and reticulation, serviced by a targeted rate on the properties in a new development.”

Twyford acknowledged that any system for infrastructure bonds issued by new authorities such as Municipal Utility Districts (MUDs), which are used in the United States to raise finance for suburban infrastructure, had to ensure that ratings agencies saw them as separate from Councils.

“Critically you’ve got to solve the question of where that debt sits and on whose balance sheet,” he said.

Get Local Government out of the way.

They are an anathema as far as core infrastructure responsibilities are concerned, preferring instead to piss hundreds of millions away on unecessary BS. e.g. comms budgets, consultants and ‘Well Beings’

The insatiable needs of the bureaucrats come first
5 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 12:16pm
kowtow

How utterly mad have we got?

“The Home Office has quietly proposed a programme called Operation Constrain, designed to forgive terrorists and reintegrate them into society.

Under the scheme jihadis returning from the collapsing Islamic State would be placed in the hands of social services, given counselling, helped to find a job and offered council housing – even being bumped up waiting lists ahead of needy families.”

http://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/873340/Terrorist-council-homes-UK
17 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 12:17pm
- UrbanNeocolonialist
  
  Committee for the Liberation and Integration of Terrorist Operatives and their Reintegration Into Society, or CLITORIS for short.
  
  13 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 12:28pm
Inandout

Jacinda is speaking bull on the ZB Farming show. She is full of shit, with little substance.
18 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 12:34pm
- Manolo
  
  What’s new? 😀
  
  10 2
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 12:58pm
wiseowl

Trumpy

“we’re too politically correct to do anything”

Go Trumpy.
9 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 12:35pm
Maxx

So just reading goodbye to the east-west link. Was always going to go anyway but I see Goff is now saying that he is looking at a targeted rate for properties that benefit from new infrastructure.

So you’ll have a targeted rate from new infrastructure and the value of your property will also go up because of the infrastructure which will see your rates go up? Double whammy!
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/98472100/new-government-bins-aucklands-eastwest-link-after-pm-meets-mayor
6 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 12:36pm
fernglas

Andrew Little wins in the Court of Appeal in respect of one of the unresolved causes of action, on the basis that the unresolved verdicts did not give rise to a further basis for action that survived Mr Hagaman’s death. Costs awarded to him from the estate. Unclear whether this decision will apply to the other 3 unresolved causes of action, but it seems likely.
6 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 12:56pm
- Captain Mainwaring
  
  What a coincidence that the Judge wouldn’t let the new Attorney-General lose this case and that the Hagaman estate has to pay his legal costs.
  Does this precedent mean that Labour Ministers can now slander people without fear of being taken to the cleaners?
  
  18 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 1:20pm
  - fernglas
    
    Three judges in the Court of Appeal, and they were dealing with a cause of action that the jury was undecided on, so it’s a bit harsh to suggest the decision was biased. The principle that a cause of action in defamation doesn’t survive the death of the plaintiff is pretty well established; the only question is whether the decision was held back until after the election, and that is more likely.
    
    5 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 2:06pm
    - Nick R
      
      The appeal hearing was on 28 September, after the election, so the decision was not held back.
      
      5 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 2:34pm
- KevOB
  
  The common law relating to actions ceasing on death is ancient. The widow should have accepted the advice she would have been given.
  
  3 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 2:56pm
Digmen1

The only way to stop islamic terrorism.
Is to call it islamist terrorism
And to stop letting any muslims into our western countries.
And to close all mosques
And to start sending all muslims back.
And ban all pro-refugees groups

For them its a war, so it needs to be a war for us.

Long live Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Myanmar.
13 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 1:25pm
Digmen1

And to stop saying that “we will not let them beat us” because every time they kill one of us, they are beating us!
And to stop saying we will “stand together”

Time to start acting! Proactively
5 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 1:28pm
cmm

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/98484654/green-mps-chloe-swarbrick-and-golriz-ghahraman-host-picnic-at-parliament

… and the crowds went…… somewhere else.

Looks worse than an Andy picnic!
6 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 1:41pm
- Longknives
  
  Just saw TV footage- There wasn’t even 100 people there!
  
  2 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 7:08pm
tom hunter

Good common sense comments from Mark Steyn as usual, Jihad on the Bike Path. First up is good old Andrew Cuomo, Governor of New York:

We go forward together. And we go forward stronger than ever. We’re not going to let them win…We’ll go about our business. Be New Yorkers. Live your life. Don’t let them change us.

What? Like go shopping? That was Bush’s advice no? And I recall him being ridiculed for that! Steyn makes the obvious counterpoint:

But they are changing us. I’ve written before about what I’ve called the Bollardization of the Western World
…
Why? Why does every public place have to get uglified up just because Geraldo doesn’t want to address the insanity of western immigration policies that day by day advance the interests of an ideology explicitly hostile to our civilization? Instead Geraldo wants to tighten up vehicle rental. Why?

Why should you have to lose an extra 15 minutes at an already sclerotic check-in counter because Hertz and Avis and UHaul have to run your name through the No-Rent list? Why should open, free societies become closed, monitored, ugly, cramped and cowering?

Cowering. That’s the word.

And a word for President Trump – and this is what Steyn wrote just a couple of months ago:

Yesterday President Trump said he was committed to ensuring that terrorists “never again have a safe haven to launch attacks against our country”.

By that he means “safe havens” in Afghanistan. But the reason the west’s enemies are able to pile up a continuous corpse count in Paris, Nice, Berlin, Brussels, London, Manchester, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Orlando, San Bernadino, Ottawa, Sydney, Barcelona, [Your Town Here] is because they have “safe havens” in France, Germany, Britain, Scandinavia, North America, etc.

Which “safe havens” are likely to prove more consequential for the developed world in the years ahead..? In Afghanistan, we’re fighting for something not worth winning, and we’re losing. In Europe, Islam is fighting for something very much worth winning, and they’re advancing.
6 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 1:45pm
Rodney Randall

http://study.com/academy/lesson/miltons-areopagitica-summary-analysis-quiz.html

“Parliament cited the dangers of blasphemous, insulting, and otherwise dangerous information spreading. However, Milton argues, ideas and information spread by more than just books. If you are trying to protect people from bad influences with this law, won’t you need to censor songs, dancing, clothing, and everything enjoyable in life? Imagine a world where you needed to fill out a government form to tell a joke or have a conversation in public. Doesn’t that sound dreadful?”

Can someone in Louisa Wall’s electorate drop a copy of Milton’s Areopagitica to her?

Maybe forward an extra copy to the ‘judge’ and the ‘lay’ people who are going to assist the judge in a determination/ruling
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 1:50pm
Stars And Stripes

Fireworks ban about pushing speedway out of Western Springs, says promoter
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11939653
“A last-minute refusal by Auckland Council to allow fireworks at Vodafone Springs Speedway on Guy Fawkes night has left the promoter seething and will disappoint thousands of families.
The council’s Regional Facilities Auckland (RFA), has reneged on a written approval, sent a week ago, that fireworks planning for the event met all requirements”.

All the bedwetters at the Auckland Council continue their ideological struggle against certain groups trying to have fun.
I’m sure the fireworks would have been allowed and probably subsidised if it was a diversity celebration day.
5 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 1:55pm
- sooty
  
  Name and shame this person from the council. Seen as the council gave approval there should be a case of compensation to the speedway for osts incured, lose of profit, etc, etc. You withdraw the permit, you pay! How you like 5hem biccies. Numptys!
  
  0 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 6:00pm
Inandout

http://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/walmart-shooting-in-thornton-colorado/news-story/5a6b857868b5a0ef6b3fe58d9986f489

A lone wolf most likely.
2 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 2:30pm
- fernglas
  
  I’ve always thought it a bit harsh on the wolves to be stigmatised through association with homicidal white American males. Perhaps a hyena is a better comparison.
  
  “hyenas feed on carrion and are thought of as cowardly.”
  
  Although the prey of these creatures do not deserve to be described as carrion, attacking defenceless prey seems to be a proclivity of the hyena.
  
  4 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 3:10pm
stinkypete

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11939658

i must have missed the point at which papers thought it OK to publish photos of topless underage girls
5 6
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 2:40pm
- Padriv Ustoev
  
  They covered their tits up with a black square, put your moralizing away.
  These girls are probably much more experienced than you think.
  
  6 2
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 2:49pm
  - stinkypete
    
    they are idenfifiable children
    im not moralising but im not sure its legal to publish such images
    
    3 6
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 2:54pm
    - Stars And Stripes
      
      According to Stuff all the girls are 17 so no one is underage and no one is a child.
      I think if you look closely they all had a really nice smile!!!.
      
      6 1
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 3:06pm
  - kowtow
    
    “These girls are probably much more experienced than you think.”
    
    I’m wondering which has had more rides , the bike or the two slappers on it.
    
    7 4
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 3:05pm
    - Rich Prick
      
      Tough call, but that’s Hamilton for ya.
      
      3 0
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 3:14pm
      - kowtow
        
        Chlamyiliton.
        
        6 1
        Report
        November 2, 2017 3:20pm
    - stinkypete
      
      i can tell im the only
      father of a 17 year old girl in this conversation
      jeesh
      
      2 7
      Log in to Reply
      Report
      November 2, 2017 3:43pm
      - Padriv Ustoev
        
        Sure you are.
        
        5 0
        Report
        November 2, 2017 4:36pm
Johnboy

She’s just got to keep Gaylord on the porch and away from the interns now and everythings going to be sweet! 🙂
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/98470558/jacinda-ardern-more-politically-powerful-than-hillary-clinton
9 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 2:49pm
- Padriv Ustoev
  
  Yeah, I had a look at that article and had a laugh.
  Does that mean Winston Peters is more powerful than Putin, since Ardern is kind of like his Hillary.
  
  10 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 2:53pm
  - Johnboy
    
    Most likely Paddy. Vlad, after all, has to maintain some appearance of due process whereas Windbag, unilaterally, got to pick who rules us! 🙂
    
    1 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 3:00pm
- Maggy Wassilieff
  
  NZ is Bugtussle Land.
  No-one beyond our shores knows we exist.
  
  Somehow I can’t imagine the financial and political power-brokers of the World are hanging out for the latest pronouncements of our Wonder-gal.
  
  6 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 4:41pm
RF

Looks like the commie chic is opening the flood gates on Manus Island and rolling out the welcome mat to the potential terrorists.

I understand they are angry young men from Moslem counties so we will finish up like Germany.

Such a lovely gesture from our airhead PM.

Hope her Govt house has plenty of spare beds.

It’s funny how one can have an intense dislike for someone you hardly know.
12 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 2:55pm
- kowtow
  
  “Ardern confirmed she will make her views clear to Australia’s Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, and that she intended to stand by the Government’s offer to resettle 150 refugees.”
  
  Why only 150 , why not all of them ? More virtue signalling from the politicians who were elected to sort out our alleged problems. Not the world’s.
  
  Taking 150 will not solve PNG’s issues with these illegal immigrants , but it will increase our problems !
  
  https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/australia/98484113/manus-island-the-least-unsafe-place-the-detainees-could-be
  
  10 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 3:03pm
  - Harriet
    
    She’s going to cause a lot of shit between both countries — but then there is a lot of aussie bashing in NZ — and for what reason I don’t know as Aussies really do like NZ!
    
    4 4
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 4:58pm
- rightoverlabour
  
  Yup, the more this has gone on the more I have to turn down the radio when she starts sprouting positivisms. I don’t watch TV, so generally that’s not an issue, but on the odd occasion I do catch a glimpse and I just want to throw up. So positive, so lovely, so vacuous… Have you ever tried to listen to her answer a question? She talks for ever and says nothing! However, got to look at the positive…. Uhh, name one please…..
  
  4 2
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:20pm
Manolo

The Obama era is over:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article182180446.html

Ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the United Nations Wednesday in a defiant speech to the 193-member General Assembly before it adopted a resolution calling for an end to the U.S. economic embargo on Cuba.

“Let’s be honest about what we really see going on here,” Haley said. “This assembly does not have the power to end the U.S. embargo. It is based in U.S. law, which only the United States Congress can change.”
11 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 3:00pm
Surely Knott

“Crusher Collins” is back according to Newshub journo Anna Bracewell. But a link to all of her other articles she never uses name calling on any other politician. The equivalent would be Socialist Cindy offers free education. It’s derogatory. And presents a National Party woman in power as if she is tough without feelings. Could even be deemed sexist as tough women deserve to be called names like crusher.
14 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 3:11pm
- UrbanNeocolonialist
  
  It’s different when the left (journalists) do it.
  
  8 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 3:51pm
Rodney Randall

https://youtu.be/RB8od83XSTA

Toronto Motorists Losing The Left’s War On Cars – Rebel Media.

Same shit happening in Christchurch.

Deranged anti car eco terrorists.
6 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 3:14pm
- Steve (North Shore)
  
  So Toronto copied Auckland? Shows that the Mayors are doing something right
  
  0 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 5:52pm
tom hunter

And the Astros win it!! 5-1.

Their first World Series in their 55 year history! Well done and it will be a big boost to the spirit of people in Houston, still recovering from Hurricane Harvey.

Quiet way to do it in a Game 7 though, especially after all the fireworks in earlier games. Lacked the drama of 2016. Five runs in the first and second inning – and then they just shut down the Dodgers for the rest of the game.
4 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 5:01pm
- Kimbo
  
  Is always a good series if it goes to seven games.
  
  So just to put the nail in the coffin of SPC’s suspect theory that any state that voted for Trump was destined to languish without any major sporting trophies, I believe Texas went red, not blue in 2016?
  
  2 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 7:08pm
- tom hunter
  
  I believe Texas went red, not blue in 2016?
  
  Why yes, Kimbo! Yes, I believe that may well be the case. Perhaps SPC can confirm this if he turns up on this sub-thread?
  
  Never mind, given the way the Yankees have re-built and played they could well be the 2018 WS winners, pleasing SPC no end.
  
  And of course that denizen of Manhattan and supporter of yuge winners himself too – President Trump. 🙂
  
  1 1
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 7:14pm
Manolo

When will the Labour Party follow suit?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/01/dnc-white-men-shouldnt-apply-for-tech-jobs.html

Though the Oct. 30 email says that the DNC is looking for a “staff of diverse voices and life experiences,” it apparently doesn’t mean white men.

DNC’s Data Service Manager Madeleine Leader purportedly wrote in an email that the desire for diversity excludes “cisgender straight white males.”

Leader adds, “I personally would prefer that you not forward to cisgender straight white males, as they are already in the majority.” Cisgender is a term for people whose gender identity matches the sex that they were assigned to at birth.
2 3
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 6:06pm
- SPLOOGE
  
  Errr. Have a look at National and all those old white men that have not only sucked on the public teat for decades but managed to personally enrich themselves.
  You need to up you game son. It’s fucking weak.
  
  1 10
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 6:21pm
  - SPLOOGE
    
    But in fairness the women were on the go too.
    A glass of curdled Oravida anyone?
    
    1 11
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 6:23pm
sooty

Just as well that phool goof did not extend his trip to Europe longer and go to the Beersheba celebrations. He would not have dared to spit on them soldiers. They would all have live rounds up the spout!
6 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 6:19pm
- SPLOOGE
  
  Phil has a city to run and he’s doing a better job than and national stooge has done.
  Banks, Polino. But disgusting lying little toadies
  
  1 13
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 6:26pm
  - Captain Mainwaring
    
    Oh dear, someone call the white-coats please.
    
    5 1
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 2, 2017 7:52pm
Maggy Wassilieff

Oh dear .. Law student who brought a case against NZ’s Climate Policy has lost her case.

http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/342953/law-student-loses-case-against-govt-s-climate-policy
10 2
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 6:32pm
Ross12

So Hipkins is fast tracking the free tertiary ed for first year students. Does it end there or is it free for second year students next year etc ?
6 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 7:07pm
- Maggy Wassilieff
  
  No, it was to be staggered through to 2024 when there will be 3 years free Tertiary.
  
  So Each 3-year election cycle gets an extra year ~~bribe~~.
  
  “Accelerating the three years’ free policy, starting with one year fees free full-time equivalent for everyone starting tertiary education or training for the first time from 1 January 2018, and extending this to three years’ free by 2024.”
  
  9 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 7:19pm
Digmen1

So is Jacinda saying we will take 150 of those Manas island scum ?

The Greens with their new muslim refugee lawyer want to take more!

You would think that the Green Party refugee lawyer would know the trouble that these guys and any offspring would cause.

No more Muslims
9 3
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 7:30pm
stigie

“and extending this to three years’ free by 2024.”

How is the Wn Fairy going to pay for all this shit…..
Oh thats right, the fucking taxpayer, if they don’t all leave town !~
5 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 7:37pm
Manolo

Flattering statistic:
http://www.infodata.ilsole24ore.com/2017/11/02/corruzione-stabilita-politica-violenza-scopri-la-classifica-delle-peggiori-democrazie/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&refresh_ce=1

L’Italia è al 69mo posto per l’efficienza del governo. Una posizione nient’affatto lusinghiera, che abbiamo calcolato prendendo la media degli indicatori della Banca Mondiale.

Sul podio salgono Nuova Zelanda, Svizzera e Norvegia, in quest’ordine.
1 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 7:41pm
- Maggy Wassilieff
  
  They forgot to interview the Public Watchdog.
  She would have told them about corruption in NZ and Auckland City.
  
  5 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:15pm
Nostradamus

Kiwiblog readers may recall this exchange between Splooge and RRM:

RRM: Let me guess Splooge – you’re not “filthy fucking rich”?

Splooge: No, but I do drive an Audi and keep my Yacht at Westhaven. LOL at you RRM. Fancy a sail this evening?

RRM: I call BS. Yacht owners are too busy fixing their yachts to get mad about politics in online forums.

Splooge: Call BS all you like RRM, but I do and I bet YOU don’t. Miserable git. Being a single man, a working professional in my 40s I do what ever I like, when ever I like and answer to very few. So if I want a yacht, I buy one, I was bored with the BM so I bought an Audi (V8), but I bet you are monitored by the missus and your only outlet is on here and on the toilet, either place the outcome from you is largely the same.

And this exchange between Splooge and thedavincimode:

Splooge: No Kevin, I drive an Audi and keep my yacht at Westhaven.

TDM: Micro penis alert.

Splooge: No tdm, I stand accused here of being a leftie, my friends accuse me of being a right wing tosser. I try and reason with the right by explaining the a leftie wouldn’t drive the biggest Audi available and keep his yacht at Westhaven but that argument falls flat at the dinner table. But now you have brought up penis size. Mine is a healthy 8 inches and of reasonable girth, but more importantly I know how to use it, coupled with charm,good clothes and a nice Audi and boat (kept at Westhaven Marina) I get more my fair share of sex, they actually have to wait their turn,most of whom are the wives of right wing tossers who do not get satisfied at home and actually prefer a bit of rough. You might want to check where your wife goes, cos she could be gobbling me.

Splooge must get invited to lots of dinner parties!
9 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 7:50pm
- nasska
  
  Once again Davinci nails it. 🙂
  
  7 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 8:10pm
Muttonbird

Is David Farrar about to lose his parliamentary access?

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/98473124/list-of-lobbyists-with-access-to-parliament-to-be-reviewed-by-new-speaker
3 9
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 7:57pm
- Inandout
  
  There are 46 on the National side with good stories to tell. The Hydra will leak like a sieve.
  
  5 0
  Log in to Reply
  Report
  November 2, 2017 9:32pm
  - Muttonbird
    
    Just saying David Farrar has been very disrespectful toward Mallard over the years, and he was also allegedly involved in Dirty Politics.
    
    0 2
    Log in to Reply
    Report
    November 3, 2017 5:36am
rangitoto

Things looking up in Venezuela.

“November is coming, and on Wednesday, November 1, Christmas happiness starts because we are going to enjoy the last two months of the year in revelry. There will be a lot of very important surprises,” Maduro said.

They are putting Greebore first’s regional development plans to shame:

“Maduro also announced the approval of a 400-billion bolívar emergency fund to go towards regional budgets, work bonuses, and the improvement of public services.”

Awesome, that’s about US$100,000, nearly enough to pay for one of Phil Goff’s spin doctors. I wonder how long it will take for the NZ governing muppets to achieve parity of the NZ$ with the Bolivar.
6 1
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:42pm
realityczech

“These folk are sprinkled with lunatic peaceniks of the ilk of those who tried to wreck the electronic spy station in Nelson, and others who sheltered the Algerian Islamic Salvation Front politician who illegally crashed into New Zealand.”

LOL the face of religious extremism folks. 🙂

In one paragraph Jackie describes people who want peace as “lunatics” and goes on to attack Muslims.

The topic was actually communism but he could not contain his religious hatred for even a few sentences.
2 9
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 8:46pm
Jack5

Evening ☪ Kea/realityczech ☪

Two upticks, so you’re only running three pseudonyms tonight.

So trolls get tired like the rest of us.

How’s the genealogy research going? On the Syrian side, still stuck with a long line of camel drivers, are ya?

Seeing as you are a little twit, you might try for one of those boy-jockey jobs at a camel racing stable in the Gulf. You might have some hereditary skill in that. ?
5 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 2, 2017 11:10pm
Manolo

It cannot be good for the United States:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/1/muslims-soon-beat-out-jews-us-population/

There are about 3.35 million Muslims in the United States right now, according to recent Pew Research Center’s Factank figures.

But by 2050, that particular population is projected to grow — from about 1 percent of the U.S. population to about 2.1 percent. If it does, that means America will be home to more Muslims than Jews.
2 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 3, 2017 6:23am

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« How will Labour deal with a massive gas find?

No youthquake »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 37.4K other subscribers

Highlights

Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments
Health Target 3 – Emergency Dept Waiting Times
Health Target 2 – Immunisations

Links

Justice in Brazil
No Right Turn
"Seymour is only doing openly what M?ori nationalists and their Pakeha allies have been doing, quietly for the past 50 years."
Not PC
A Written New Zealand Constitution?
No Minister
Daily review 22/11/2024
The Standard
Do the KCs believe in democracy
Utopia
More young offenders will get boot camp, bus drivers will get some protection – and there’s relief for southern farmers
Point of Order
Sowell says
Hompaddock
New Zealand government urged to back ICC arrest warrants for Israeli leaders without equivocation
The Daily Blog
The transgender agenda sunk Kamala
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
What does “reciprocity” mean in New Zealand laws?
Croaking Cassandra
A Day of Reckoning
NZCPR
Media Link: “A View from Afar” on the US elections.
Kiwipolitico
This will not end well
Offsetting Behaviour
Top 14 Predictions for Round 10
Stats Chat
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d