About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

January 5, 2012 8:00am by Kokila Patel

General Debate 5 January 2012

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment141

Uncategorized
General Debate

Comments (141)

Login to comment or vote

Elaycee

“So if the goverment wins the Election then they have the right to rape and pillage.”

Jesus wept. I’ll try again…. If the Government wins the election they have the right to GOVERN. As in: pass Laws that they put in front of the country as part of their election campaign. As in: selling up to 49% of taxpayer assets. As in: restructuring welfare. And bleating from the left will not prevent these policies from being implemented.

Actually, minto57, based on your ‘argument’ to date, you really come across as a bad loser rather than someone trying to put forward any cogent reason why the the elected government shouldn’t proceed with policies clearly promoted during their campaign.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 7:15pm
nasska

One day, during a lesson on proper grammar, the teacher asked for a show
of hands from those who could use the word “beautiful” in the same sentence twice.

First, she called on little Suzie, who responded with, “My father bought my mother a beautiful dress and she looked beautiful in it.”

Very good, Suzie,” replied the teacher. She then called on little
Michael.

“My mummy planned a beautiful banquet and it turned out beautifully,” he said. Excellent, Michael!”
Then, the teacher called on little Johnny.

“Last night, at the dinner table, my sister told my father that she was pregnant, and he said, “Beautiful, ……just fucking beautiful!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 7:59pm
Other_Andy

About the arguments……

In every area of our public life, the Left is losing the argument

13 years of Labour misrule in the UK served a vital purpose. In retrospect, the Brown/Blair period may be seen as a prolonged experiment which taught the liberal Left that its ideas cannot work, do not work, and have no chance of ever working.
13 years of Left-wing government has produced a mountain of evidence that the Conservative analysis is better and more truthful.
The vital importance of this experiment lay in the special circumstances of the post-war period. Throughout this time, the liberal Left, as general election results show, has tended to be unpopular with voters. But its progressive ideas have enjoyed a disproportionate amount of traction among British governing elites.
This, in turn, led to a structural imbalance. By the mid-Nineties, the Right had secured victory in four consecutive general elections. However, the broad Left had secured control of vast tracts of our national life. It was powerful way beyond its traditional power bases of the Labour Party, the trade unions and the British working classes. It dominated the higher reaches of the universities, education, the public service bureaucracy, local government, Whitehall, the media (and in particular the BBC), the churches, and the police.
So rampant and all-pervasive was the influence of this liberal-Left elite that by the end almost every meaningful action taken by the democratically elected John Major government could be sabotaged or blocked outright by a progressive alliance, which stretched through the Civil Service, the BBC, and the universities.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100127372/in-every-area-of-our-public-life-the-left-is-losing-the-argument/
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 8:05pm
big bruv

I wonder if 329 not out is enough for M Clark to win over the Aussie cricketing public?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 8:10pm
Nookin

BB. Some might say there are 329 reasons for winning over the Aussie Public. I think there are 5 – ie the number of runs that he fell shy of getting Bradman’s record. He is not yet in that class and I wonder if he made a conscious decision to declare short of that target?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 8:25pm
big bruv

Sorry for the link but DPF will not allow me to say what I really feel about this sick person on his blog.

http://clintheine.blogspot.com/
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 8:37pm
big bruv

Nookin

My comment was more to do with a large section of the Aussie cricketing public not being that keen having Clark as captain. They do not see him as macho or ‘real bloke’ enough to have the top job in Aussie sport. (if we think that being AB captain is a lot of pressure we have no idea what the Aussie cricket captain has to out up with)

After todays performance I imagine he has won over a few fans but the hard core (munter types) might take a bit more convincing.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 8:43pm
Nostalgia-NZ

Reid says,

‘Well who cares, minto? Who cares what you and your ilk think? We won, you lost, eat that. What about that, don’t you understand?

After all, it was one of your own who came up with that, wasn’t it. What’s the matter, isn’t one of your own lessons applicable to you?’

So generous in ‘victory.’ Maybe not victory he likes at all one thinks.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 8:57pm
big bruv

Question 1: Who the hell is Tapu Misa and why should anybody care what she has to say about anything?

Question 2: How many birth certificates does Obama have to produce before the nutbar Christian conservative types give up trying to prove he is not a natural born US citizen?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 9:05pm
reid

So generous in ‘victory.’ Maybe not victory he likes at all one thinks.

Nostalgia don’t get me wrong. The original words were both ill-chosen and prophetic: ill-chosen since it revealed a truth about the ideology and prophetic in for example it played out not least in the emptying-of-the-larder tactic at a time when, although it was quite obvious to all in govt, it wasn’t in th best interests of the country and (thanks to the useless MSM) not at all obvious to the public.

Such spiteful, hateful intolerant approaches abound in lefty politics, and that was all I was pointing out.

This ‘lack of mandate’ thing is just another example of the same long tactic which I perfectly see: it’s simply propaganda designed to long term inculcate the masses, yes, I know that. I just get so sick of it especially when the country is in crisis yet lefties nevertheless insist on playing their usual games. This to me Nostalgia, is traitorous so I’m surprised given your pen-name that you don’t see that but apparently, you don’t. Isn’t that interesting.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 9:32pm
Nostalgia-NZ

The mandate is what the Govt decide it is, they will take liberties on that as they are entitled, later the people will vote on those decisions or others more pressing on the day.
JK doesn’t gloat over the victory Reid, neither should he. However, it remains clear that Key is patching out a much different course than his predecessors which is not entirely comfortable on all fronts. But you already knew that.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 9:45pm
reid

…it remains clear that Key is patching out a much different course than his predecessors which is not entirely comfortable on all fronts. But you already knew that.

Indeed he is Nostalgia and IMO its due to an unrealistic set-up of memes by the lefties.

Also they profoundly believe in Keynesianism to the point of mistaking Hayeckian theory to being responsible for the de-regulation which seeded the GFC, failing to sheet home responsibility to the real culprit, which is of course the actions of the wise Chairman of the Fed surrounded by his coterie of equally wise ~~henchmen~~ advisors as instructed by the the Congress and Senate over the years, due to the lobbyists, you see.

Why don’t lefties focus on exposing that role and the global machinations as they effect us here in NZ Nostalgia, if they really do want poverty to ~~get reduced so long as poor people still vote for us~~ end?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 10:03pm
TimG_Oz

Hi Reid,

Here are my answers to your questions from Friday

Why isn’t Iran allowed to have the bomb?

Iran isn’t allowed to have the bomb because they signed the International Atomic Energy Authority non-proliferation treaty. OK, so this isn’t really what you are asking. Perhaps a better phrasing is why shouldn’t Iran be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons.

Forgetting about Israel for the time being, if Iran gets the bomb, it could lead to a nuclear arms race throughout the region, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Syria. If we have a look at all the Mid East Conflicts (Iran-Iraq war, Kuwait invasion etc), it’s clear that Israel is only involved in a fraction. We have to remember that Israel is not involved in most of these conflicts.

Why is it automatically assumed that Iran if she had it would use it?

Apart from the rhetoric – even from yesterday like this, you are right, it could be very unlikely that Iran initiate a war that would cause them great loss.

However, it might not actually be Iran that uses a nuclear weapon. Iran is shipping missiles to Hamas and Hezbollah. Why not a nuclear weapon or dirty bomb. This is not just a threat to Israel, but also the US, or any other terrorist targets.

I am concerned though that a leader who has no issue killing resistance to his regime when he loses an election may also be willing to sacrifice his own people for the destruction of his enemies.

Why aren’t Israel’s 350+ nukes taken into account as a deterrent factor whenever Iran getting a nuke is discussed by the Western MSM?

Firstly neither you, nor I know how many nukes Israel has (or Iran has for that matter). It is still a closely guarded secret (no thanks to Mordechai Vanunu). Geographically speaking, MAD is not guaranteed – mainly because the total size of all the Arab nations is so vast. Israel acquired them because it was under existential threat without nukes. Imagine the damage to such a tiny country as Israel with a nuclear weapon. It would be simply devastating. The same cannot be said for Iran.

I personally wish Israel did not have nuclear weapons. I’m not sure if there is any alternative, and it’s only a matter of time before Iranian and arab technology catches up – perhaps including a missile defence system.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 10:31pm
reid

Forgetting about Israel for the time being, if Iran gets the bomb, it could lead to a nuclear arms race throughout the region, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Syria. If we have a look at all the Mid East Conflicts (Iran-Iraq war, Kuwait invasion etc)

Why would it lead to an arms race with of those named ME states and who cares if it did? Why is that a reason to deny Iran what Israel already has?

However, it might not actually be Iran that uses a nuclear weapon. Iran is shipping missiles to Hamas and Hezbollah. Why not a nuclear weapon or dirty bomb. This is not just a threat to Israel, but also the US, or any other terrorist targets.

I guess it depends on whether you think the “war on terror” is like the “war on drugs” and likely to drag on for decades with no end in sight ever and no improvement despite trillions of your pension fund swallowed up in it for no outcome whatsoever or whether you think it really is about these fiendishly clever ubiquitous asymetric bad guys who just pop up out of nowhere and collapse buildings using nothing but planes who are funded by a giant Dr Evil called Iran who coincidentally appears to hate our best friend, Israel.

It’s a bit like a movie, isn’t it Tim, except it potentially involves Muslim-Christian war and economic collapse, but one supposes that’s not very important, compared to the risk of Iran getting just a bit of radio-activity.

Like I said Tim in the original post, you still have not explained why MAD does not apply. Iran is a serious country – five? times the size of Iraq. It’s not going to let sensitive material get into the wrong hands anymore than Russia would have in the Cold War. Israel knows that. The US knows it. The UN knows it. MAD applies. Security risk – same setting for any other nuclear-capable country. Yet still the useless and pathetic MSM bray for a single outcome, arousing similar braying amongst those inclined to listen.

am concerned though that a leader who has no issue killing resistance to his regime when he loses an election may also be willing to sacrifice his own people for the destruction of his enemies.

Crikey Tim that could be applied equally to every single leader of Israel except Yitzhak Rabin.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 11:03pm
TimG_Oz

Hi Reid,

Interestingly enough, you completely ignored my point on Hamas and Hezbollah, and their Iranian missiles. That’s a proven fact (sadly).

Here are two links which actually support your argument. Two Mossad chiefs (not including Dagan) stating Iran is not an existential threat. What about Ephraim Halevy’s argument about Haredi (is he a visionary??). Did you get the book (I believe there was a delay … apologies).

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/mossad-chief-nuclear-iran-not-necessarily-existential-threat-to-israel-1.404227
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4143909,00.html

I strongly disagree with your last point. The Israeli Prime Ministership has been a revolving door, nobody is killing anybody to keep it (more to get away from it).

If you’re right and MAD applies, and nukes are never ever used because neither side will start one, we’ll all have happy days, and peace can break out and we’ll have nuclear disarmament talks. Well, maybe not.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 11:14pm
reid

Interestingly enough, you completely ignored my point on Hamas and Hezbollah, and their Iranian missiles. That’s a proven fact (sadly).

Tim, I didn’t mean to. It’s just they’re irrelevant in the context. A potential nuclear-capable nation is what we’re discussing, not local territorial disputes which is essentially strategically what any Hamas or Hezbollah attack or strategy is.

I strongly disagree with your last point.

Re: the last point, yes, sorry, should have deleted those last two paras – early drafts.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 11:28pm
TimG_Oz

It’s just they’re irrelevant in the context. A potential nuclear-capable nation is what we’re discussing

My point is that the nuclear-capable nation would develop the bomb, and use a proxy to deliver it (or just arm the proxy). These organisations are not capable of developing one on their own. And it’s already happening with conventional weapons, so WMD are also a reality. I feel it’s very relevant.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 5, 2012 11:35pm
Scott Chris

TimG_Oz says:- “and use a proxy to deliver it”

You’ve clearly bought into the “Mad Arab” propaganda. So say Hamas gets hold of a dirty bomb and uses it. Israel will then have carte blanche to obliterate Hamas and the Yanks will go after the supplier, whoever they decide that supplier to be. Probably Iran, whether or not it actually would have been Iran. They might have the sense to plant a few WMDs this time though.

Mad Arabs ain’t that mad. Of course, the Yanks do have a whole bunch of soldiers freed up to go bomb the fuck out of a whole bunch of new Mad Arabs…. or should I say Persians.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:05am
reid

My point is that the nuclear-capable nation would develop the bomb, and use a proxy to deliver it (or just arm the proxy).

Yes I know you think that Tim but why? Why doesn’t MAD apply? When it apparently does for every other nuclear-capable nation?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:27am
Paul Rain

Yes, because the US has never shafted its friends before. Nuclear deterrence only works when you’re dealing with people who a) want worldly power more than a legacy and b) will certainly face nuclear devastation should they pull the trigger. a probably holds true for most of the leaders of the failure states. b is uncertain- the cheapest way to keep the barbarians throwing spears over the gates rather than nukes might be for the US to rent Israel a nuclear-armed sub.

Scott Chris: Mad Arabs aren’t that mad? Yeah, and Mugabe would never destroy the civilized nation he was given. Not very solid thinking.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 3:27am
TimG_Oz

Why doesn’t MAD apply?

MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) is essentially the concept that “if you press your button, then I press my button”

In the case of a proxy, it’s a bit murkier. Do you target the proxy, or the provider? As per a major attack (like 9/11), it takes time just to dissect what has happened. You don’t target Iran and North Korea for supplying SCUD missiles or Katyushas.

Mad Arabs ain’t that mad.

Right. They aren’t mad enough to:

– Entice their children to blow themselves up on buses and crowded shopping malls
– Fire rockets from densely populated areas, when they are outnumbered, knowing that any retribution will hit general population
– Dance on roofs while SCUD missiles rain upon them
– Fly jetliners into skyscrapers

What a pathetic argument.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 7:59am
pollywog

based on your ‘argument’ to date, you really come across as a bad loser rather than someone trying to put forward any cogent reason why the the elected government shouldn’t proceed with policies clearly promoted during their campaign.

and no one, not even the govt has come up with a credible case as to why it is neccessary to sell state assets.

least of all you Loony And Crapulous with your version of we won, you lost, eat that. Hardly a credible argument for support of selling off the nations assets is it ?

Why is there no recent polling done on the issue ? Could it be because it is still massivley unpopular amongst middle NZ ?

If Key is acting in the best interests of the nation and with the required mandate to implement state asset sales then go to the public with this one issue not clouded by the debacle that was the elction and prove it.

Put this baby to rest once and for all !…of course he won’t cos he’s, IMHO, a self serving coward.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 10:06am
Manolo

The usual news expected from “peaceful” natives: http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/6217040/Youth-gang-robs-Wairoa-visitor
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 10:21am
pollywog

yup… get used to it manolo

theres nothing peaceful about a class war where the natives are getting fucked over and have to fight assymetrically.

and shit’s only gonna get worse when state asset sales increase the inequality gap between haves and have nots and benefit bashing cuts to welfare leave some with little option but to revert to crime.

idle hands make the devils work

So how’s them 170 000 jobs Key was going to create for us in his election spiel coming along or even some gov’t incentives for youth to train for jobs or keep them in school longer and move them into tertiary training ?

How about the incentive for Kiwi mums and dads to get into business and push this country in the right direction instead of providing a safe option to tie up their money in powerco shares ?

reap what you sow
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 10:38am
Elaycee

@Pollypad has emerged again to continue the Gween rant against the partial sale of assets.

When a government goes to the electorate (well in advance of the election) and announces a policy of partial sale of nominated state assets and then the electorate gets the chance to vote for the same policies, then surely you can accept that National (as the winner of the election) has the right to continue with the implementation of the same policies. No??

Then, I can only imagine the outrage you felt (and wrote about) when Hulun Klark, Margaret Wilson et al decided to sever ties with the Privy Council – all without warning and without the electorate having the opportunity to vote for or against. No?? Thought not.

Your reaction is typical of a bad loser – wanting to change the rules because you don’t like the result. Unlucky. Get over it. Buy some shares in Mighty River Power. Probably a better return on your investment than Pollypad T Shirts!

And BTW, Pollypad – John Key DID go to the electorate about partial asset sales – the vote was on November 26th!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 10:39am
pollywog

more irrelevent shit and looking to the past Loopy ?…*yawn*

Turn around, face the future. Don’t be a coward like your fanboy hero and make a cogent case for selling state assets for once instead of crawlybumlicking John Key’s arse eh ?

Tell us how it benefits the economy and society as a whole to sell of the nations assets.

I bet you can’t because Key hasn’t given you a case to argue for and then parrot online. Even DPF and Whale can’t spin this turd of a policy into gold for anyone but the wealthy, hence the lack of polling and propaganda.

By all means, continue with your head in the sand repeating the mandate mantra, we won, you lost, eat that, we can do whatever the fuck we like and fuck what the nation thinks…nyah nyah nyah.

makes you look real mature and all knowing especially when you throw the personal insults in there as well.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 10:55am
Elaycee

Pollypad says: “makes you look real mature and all knowing especially when you throw the personal insults in there as well…” Just after he wrote “…more irrelevent shit and looking to the past Loopy ?…*yawn*”

Hypocrite: TICK.

And a few more:

National returned: TICK.
Partial asset sales: TICK
Mandate for this: TICK.
Reduced spending: TICK
Benefits restructured: TICK.

Is this a good start? TICK
Am I happy with this? TICK 😀
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 11:19am
pollywog

allow me to add to your list…

can’t make a cogent case for state asset sales: TICK
resorting to banality: TICK
PWNED by pollywog: TICK

…you’re not fooling anyone but yourself with your cheap handwaving parlour tricks that fail to distract your ineptitude.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP !!!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 11:32am
Elaycee

Pollypad: Please be careful you don’t have a total melt down – someone would have to clean up the mess!

No need for “PUT UP OR SHUT UP !!!” because the debate on partial asset sales is over. Done and dusted. No referenda on the cards. No second vote needed. Its now time for action. And its time for fast tracking all open cast mining / offshore oil exploration / development of our coal exports to China and others / etc. We need to increase revenues whilst at the same time decrease / eliminate the money we currently pour into career welfare bludgers / professional dole gatherers / ‘training’ on daft courses such as basket weaving etc and instead, divert the money into more productive activities.

But whilst on partial asset sales, I hear that Mighty River Power may be the first (of many) on the list – isn’t that great? A long term, proven performer and a good opportunity for Mum and Dad investors to be able to channel some of their retirement funds.

Will you be looking to subscribe? Shall I send the prospectus to you mail address in Nelson? Or will you check it out on-line? I’d hate for you to miss out on the opportunity….
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 11:48am
pollywog

There was never a debate on the need to sell state assets and it’s obvious if there were, you wouldn’t have an opinion on it unless John Key gave you one to echo.

parroting the mum and dad line…zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Mum and dad got fucked over in the finance company fiasco following charlatans like Key’s advice. Most are broke and struggling and the rest will be looking to turn a quick profit selling to foreign investors at the first sign of a share price rise.

The only long term proven performance is that selling state assets makes the country poorer and shifts the profits offshore.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 11:55am
Manolo

Think again, Polly.

With the money earnt from your shares you could buy kilos and kilos of taro for you and the extended and stout Pasifika family.

Imagine how seductive you’d look at 150 kilos, a mere 20 over your current weight.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 11:58am
pollywog

Nah…the taro we get here isn’t worth buying in bulk Manolo.

and yeah i’ve put on a couple kilo since laying off the gym over x-mass. I’m now clocking 89 instead of the trim, taut and terrific 87 of a few weeks ago. 🙂
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:06pm
Elaycee

Pollypad: “Mum and dad got fucked over in the finance company fiasco “….

Jesus wept! They lost out because they decided to put money into high risk options that didn’t work! Why do you think that Finance Companies offered higher interest than traditional Banks? Because there was a greater RISK! Buyer beware and all that…. so no sympathies here.

And who’s fault was it, Pollypad, that SCF went tits up? Mine? No. John Key’s? No – of course not. SCF was totally mismanaged – and we will see bad it was mismanaged when it all gets before the Court.

Got anything better than hot air? Nah – thought not. But it could have been worse, Pollypad – you could have voted Gween.

And look what that got you – another three years on the opposition benches!

Bwahahahaaaaaaaaaa. Ain’t life great? 😀
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:23pm
reid

Mum and dad got fucked over in the finance company fiasco following charlatans like Key’s advice.

No Key wasn’t involved in that at all PW. You see anyone who couldn’t see the GFC coming a few years before 2007 was an idiot. Personally I saw something was going to happen from 2005 onward. I didn’t know what it was going to be till 2006 when I started reading about sub-prime. Since then the picture of exactly what happened has emerged which is that political pressure and donations from Wall Street lobbyists caused Congress to waive all of the regulations it used to have which prevented the toxic products from being made. These same lobbyists are also responsible for the bail-outs and the ‘too big to fail’ meme and Obama has more ex-Wall Streeters in his Administration than any other President in history.

In the 90’s Greenspan had dropped interest rates to zero which meant the dot-bomb bubble never worked its way out of the system and it formed the nexus of the real-estate bubble. Anyone who couldn’t see all this at least by 2006-7 really had no business whatsoever being in the markets at all and I count term deposits with Finance Companies who specialised in what is apparently the only game in NZ, property development, the very thing most at risk – as being in the markets.

So anyone who lost money through Blue Chip or the other fantasies really only have themselves to blame. The drop-dead obvious clue even if you didn’t the research like I did into those above things, was that the boom-bust business cycle for this run since the 1990’s was so atypical from everything we’d had before and given what happened in 1987 when the same thing happened, you’d have to be mental. It’s true of course that history repeats itself but often missed corollary to that is that it repeats when one forgets it and personally, while I was only in my early twenties in the 1980’s I knew what had happened and I didn’t forget it so if anyone older than I am did forget then I’m afraid to me, that’s their fault.

So notice in all of this PW that Key is not involved in any of this, at all. He was in charge of foreign currency exchange at Merrill. He wasn’t, in other words, involved in those toxic financial instruments. I know you know this, but like all lefties you like to setup the meme for the useful idiots: i.e. anyone inclined to vote for you. We all know you’re doing this and it’s very telling isn’t it that you would really have to be an idiot not to see what you are doing, wouldn’t so. So by definition all of your voters have to be idiots, don’t they.

How does make you feel PW. One of a number of idiots. Even a low-to-mid ranked leader of idiots, possibly. Who knows, you seem very interested in politics, perhaps you’re on a committee of idiots.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:34pm
pollywog

Sure the mums and dads lost out so theres even less of them to invest in powercos but the ones who gained and will from selling state assets aren’t average Kiwi mums and dads are they ?

They’re the financial elite who gamed the SFC in its dying days and preyed on the flaws in the guarantee scheme. The ones like Key, the self serving banker and his foreign based overlords.

And look what that got you – another three years on the opposition benches!

*yawn*…we won, you lost, yeah got that and it’s all you got. NEXXXXT !!!

life’s a playground…what you lose on the swings you gain on the roundabouts.

3 years in my scheme of things ain’t shit.

enjoy it while you can and when it all turns to shit just remember karma is a bitch.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:35pm
Elaycee

Pollypad: well, at least we agree on one thing!

Karma IS a bitch. Especially when the Gweens have been rejected by Labour under Klark and now (twice) by National.

In fact, the Gweens are currently all alone at the dance of the desperates. And when the traditional left vote swings back from the Gweens and Winston’s Worst to Labour, then we will all be back to the future. But still with a National led Government.

Now, THAT’s karma! 😀
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:45pm
pollywog

So notice in all of this PW that Key is not involved in any of this, at all. He was in charge of foreign currency exchange at Merrill. He wasn’t, in other words, involved in those toxic financial instruments.

Key in his heart of hearts knew what was going on and i wouldn’t be surprised if he benefitted from it as many of his, and Bill English, mates probably did from allowing Sth Canterbury Finance to collapse as it did.

but my initial quote you misinterpreted is that it was the advice of charlatans like Key, not Key himself who conned mums and dads out of their savings to invest in risky housing/building related projects that went belly up in the GFC.

now don’t you feel a bit of an idiot charging of on your know it all steed ranting about what a clever clogs you are ?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:45pm
pollywog

The greens have increased their political capital in this last election more than any other party.

Labour have abandoned the left and cosied up to the centre right to try and tap into the sheeple demographic that vote on personality rather than policy hence promoting Shearer into the lead role.

National were only a dogsballs pubic hair lick from having to do a deal with the greens this time round to form a gov’t and secure a *mandate*.

Next election we’ll see who laughs longest eh ?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 12:51pm
reid

Key in his heart of hearts knew what was going on and i wouldn’t be surprised if he benefitted from it as many of his, and Bill English, mates probably did from allowing Sth Canterbury Finance to collapse as it did.

but my initial quote you misinterpreted is that it was the advice of charlatans like Key, not Key himself

No I didn’t miss that distinction, PW. Even lefty voters aren’t so stupid as to confuse the role of that of the Head of Foreign Exchange Trading at Merrill Lynch with that of a financial advisor. Even though you lefties would like your voters to swallow that one, you know that even your profoundly confused voters wouldn’t wear it, don’t you. So to create the meme, you all deliberately conflate them as being all part of the same bunch: the hated “banksters.” This is how the meme works, doesn’t it.

Why don’t you admit it here, PW, it is a meme isn’t it and you know it is, don’t you. We all know it, why not admit you’re doing it? None of your potential useful idiots would ever come here, you know that, so it’s safe for you to admit it here, if you want to. If you don’t want to then what’s your point. Just continuing to repeat it as if you think it’s true just makes you an annoying little tick whose making as much sense as philu or Penny. Is that what you want to be?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 1:01pm
pollywog

No I didn’t miss that distinction, PW.

I’m inclined to think you’re not being intellectually honest reid and were merely looking for a way to give yourself mad props while engaging in your favourite pastime of lefty hating.

i bet you only discovered what a meme is in the last few days too eh ?

as far as idiots go, you’re not even useful…you’re a bulltitty sucker !!!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 1:11pm
reid

I’m inclined to think you’re not being intellectually honest reid and were merely looking for a way to give yourself mad props while engaging in your favourite pastime of lefty hating.

I don’t really care what your opinion is PW, about anything. C’mon, just admit it: it is a meme, isn’t it.

I don’t BTW hate lefties, I don’t really hate anyone. I do have contempt for anyone’s intellect if they vote lefty for one really is an idiot if one thinks anything lefties say they stand for such as reducing poverty will ever be improved by anything they propose. A remarkable number of Wellingtonians are lefty. This is why Wellington stood out from the rest of the country on election night with the red spots amidst a sea of blue. They’re not thick it’s just a lot of them have spent their entire working lives in govt service so they have no idea of how the world works. They think it works out of Wellington. A lot of them really do buy the peace-union-big-govt lefty line of bullshit, even though they are otherwise sophisticated worldly people. So when I go on and on about them being idiots, I don’t mean they have low IQs I mean they are naive in their world view.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
January 6, 2012 1:22pm

More comments:

‹
1
2

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« The 37th and 38th PMs

More Nxabega »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 37.4K other subscribers

Highlights

Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments
Health Target 3 – Emergency Dept Waiting Times
Health Target 2 – Immunisations

Links

John McLean: Jolly Rogers, Nga Mihi...Ngarangi
Breaking Views
Yes I am A Denier and So very Proud to be One.
No Minister
Word of the day
Hompaddock
Guest Post: Response to Max Harris
Utopia
Te Huinga Poti – Waatea Sunday Morning Political Podcast with Labour MP Willie Jackson, Jodi Ihaka + Bomber
The Daily Blog
Open mike 24/11/2024
The Standard
Treaty Principles Debate
NZCPR
Much ado about cussing…
Point of Order
Justice in Brazil
No Right Turn
"Seymour is only doing openly what M?ori nationalists and their Pakeha allies have been doing, quietly for the past 50 years."
Not PC
The transgender agenda sunk Kamala
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
What does “reciprocity” mean in New Zealand laws?
Croaking Cassandra
Media Link: “A View from Afar” on the US elections.
Kiwipolitico
This will not end well
Offsetting Behaviour
Top 14 Predictions for Round 10
Stats Chat
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d