Teacher’s complaints ignored

Anna Leask writes on the case of the abused nine year old:

CYF will also investigate claims by the girl’s teacher that reports of abuse by the school were not investigated.

In an email to Prime Minister John Key, the teacher said she reported her concerns about “constant abuse” the girl was suffering to school management on a “weekly, almost daily” basis.

But the message the school got back from the child’s social worker was that she was “clumsy and accident prone”.

Mr Key forwarded the email, sent six days after the girl was found and her parents arrested, to Ms Bennett.

“I have grave concerns about issues raised in the letter, including the fact the teacher says she made others aware she suspected abuse was occurring,” Ms Bennett said.

“It must be incredibly heart-breaking to be closely involved with a child who has been the victim of such horrific abuse.

“I have asked for a full report on this and I intend to get to the bottom of the matter.”

In her email, the teacher said she felt powerless to do anything to protect the girl and keep her safe.

“This child has come to school with black eyes, a swollen face, swollen nose, bruises, abrasions and infected wounds that have all been explained as her being ‘clumsy and accident prone’.

“However she is only accident prone at home, she has not had a so-called accident while at school …

“Why do we have to wait for a child to be seriously injured or killed before action is taken?”

The teacher said the emotional toll of seeing the girl suffer all year was “extreme”. She had resigned from her job because she felt her concerns were not taken seriously.

“A young innocent child has suffered unimaginable pain that at her age she should not have suffered,” she told Mr Key. “Please don’t sit back and do nothing.”

Ms Mackenzie said CYF records showed concerns were raised by the school on one occasion.

“This was looked into by the social worker who did not believe this to be a result of abuse.”

“I find the issues raised by the teacher very worrying and am determined that the review gets to the bottom of exactly what happened.”

The poor teacher. If they had listened to him or her earlier, a lot of the abuse may have been prevented.

On the surface it seems both the school management and the social worker may be at fault. If the teacher raised concerns weekly and the school management only once passed these onto the social worker, then they’re let that teacher and the child down.

But it also seems clear the social worker did not investigate at all. In fact the excuse “accident prone” should ring alarm bells.