About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

October 30, 2010 9:40am by David Farrar

Excellent summary

Derek Cheng has an excellent summary of The Hobbit saga.

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment18

NZ Politics
Derek Cheng
The Hobbit

Comments (18)

Login to comment or vote

Doug

It’s great to see some investigative journalism instead of making shit up to sell News Papers.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 10:10am
TripeWryter

It appears to be a more factual account than most. But there is the usual New Zealand Herald condecension towards Jackson and the Wellington film industry.

Having said that, I do agree with the Herald’s John Roughan — the Rings book was a fad in 1971, and I felt terribly left out because when I tried to read it I found it awfully boring. I enjoyed the movies, for their spectacle and for the pride I felt that they were being made here in New Zealand by a New Zealand genius — but I can’t say I found them easy to follow.

Chris Trotter: he writes in The Dominion Post that Jackson scripted it all to get the result he and Warners wanted. I like reading Trotter sometimes — but I do wish the man would provide evidence to prove what he says.

I hope that everyone who work on the movies get treated fairly. Too many New Zealand movies get made on the unpaid and low-paid backs of enthusiasts and volunteers.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 10:15am
reid

You know the very worst thing to me is the execrable people who caused all this – the unions – refuse to acknowledge culpability instead the bastards are smearing everyone with allegations bordering on corruption.

This is both the Labour Party spin as per RedAlert and it’s the unions spin.

It’s outrageous.

Naturally one is not in the least surprised that they’re doing this, what surprises me however is that some or even many lower-level lefties are showing signs of actually believing this drop-dead obvious bollocks. Cognitive dissonance once again rears its ugly head.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 10:32am
labrator

It’s a good timeline. The one part I don’t follow is the last sentence, how does the new law “weaken workers rights”?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 11:06am
flipper

reid …..
Don’t get too upset. The good thing about the LP/LW spin is that they are preaching to themselves, witness the LP/TU letter writers. They actually think the great unwashed read the editorial (BS pages). Good!
As for O’Herald and Roughan, if Weta were based in Waitakere their views would be different. What else can we expect from such self-centred pricks?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 11:43am
pidge

The nature of a workers engagement no longer is a factor if determining if the individual is an employee or a contractor.

The workers need to decide up front if they will be a contractor (and earn more money, at the risk of arbitary termination of contract) or be an employee (and accept a money less than a contractor, but get holiday pay, breaks, kiwisaver, and cannot be arbitarily dismissed without cause).

In that way it is a weakening, but not loss of rights – no more “I’m a contractor, gimme $80/hour, but wait, I’m an employee due to the nature of the engagement (I’ve only worked for you in the last two years etc), you can’t end my contract without cause”
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 11:49am
adze

I thought the panel coverage on The Nation this morning was interesting – it took quite a different view to the negotiations, suggesting it was more a case of the government and Warners “surfing on Peter Jackson’s rage” (something which they felt kept the boycott issue alive longer than was necessary); it allowed the government and Warners to both get something neither would otherwise have been able to get.

Not sure how I feel about that. I suspect there’s more to this than meets the eye; but it seems a universally-held view that this whole debacle was a monumental union cockup.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 12:08pm
tvb

The law change probably means we now have a very decisive advantage over Australia who are heavily unionised up to their collective ears. So we are back in Business and on the back of the Hobbit announcement we got the Avatar announcement. Higher nominal production costs in NZ is actually a secondary consideration. The threats that Union action potentially present like strikes etc pose to film budgets are huge. Now with Labour issues settled and fenced off, any other threats to costs can be managed with hedging contracts and other measures.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 12:09pm
Paulus

About he only intelligent thing that the Herald has published over the whole affair. Roughan is as usual so no comment here.

Well done Derek Cheng – I am surprised the Herald let it go forward as it contradicts many earlier comments published in the paper.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 1:06pm
Yvette

Derek Cheng _ “… A universal cheer erupts in support of keeping the films here.”

adze – “but it seems a universally-held view that this whole debacle was a monumental union cockup.”

Hey guys, Universal has nothing to do with this
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 1:22pm
flipper

The nation ??????
On Saturday morning?
Rubbish!
Anyone got some REAL viewer data?
My guess is that viewership is confined to the beltway bandits in Wellington and Auckland.
They delude themselves. Do they not realise that their esoteric pontrificating is over the heads of most voters?
Carry on and stuff the LW once and for all (as will happen in Obama land next week)!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 1:28pm
Doug

You must wonder how the Labour Party feels now that Andrew Little has come out and said that the Union made a mistake in supporting the Aussie Union. So the party was sent into Parliament as Cannon Fodder, while Little and Goff stayed well clear of the mess.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 1:57pm
tvb

Good old Trev carried the can for the Labour Party. They just left him to it. I guess they figure that Mallard is so lacking in public appeal that it just does not matter what he says. So he lead the opposition and the Unions were squared. Their wholly owned subsidiary did their stuff.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 7:26pm
Viking2

The Employment Relations (Film Production Work) Amendment Act passed under urgency with the backing of National and its support parties. It was opposed by Labour and the Greens.

Despite amendments to tidy up the hastily drafted five-page law, Labour MP Charles Chauvel said it was so badly written it would do the opposite of what the Government had promised Warner and Jackson. It would provoke more court cases challenging workers’ status, not fewer.

Mr Chauvel was involved as a lawyer in the 2005 Supreme Court case that found James Bryson was an employee, not a contractor, on The Lord of the Rings production.
Ad Feedback

The Government did not understand the law and was making many more Bryson-type cases more likely, Mr Chauvel said

Anyone got an opinion on what Chauvel has said????
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 9:49pm
Nookin

Film workers are excluded from the definition of employees unless there is an employment agreement that provides that they are employees or a pre-existing agreement. I guess so long as there is a written agreement specifying that the contractor is not an employee it would be very difficult for Mr Chavel to drive through a gap. Time will tell
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 30, 2010 11:33pm
Brian Smaller

Did you see Goof in Wanganui the other day saying that he would have negotiated a better deal. Hell, if the Black Caps had me batting we would be World Champions. What a dick head thing for him to say. He never uttered a word in the whole dispute – how could he when his bosses were on one side of it.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
October 31, 2010 8:17am
Maggie

No doubt to be evenhanded Farrar will also blog on a number of columnists who have taken a different view. John Armstrong, John Drinnan, Finlay McDonald, Fran O’Sullivan, NZ Herald editorial writer, Bryan Rdman, Vernon Small…..

I won’t hold my breath,
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 1, 2010 3:22pm
RightNow

oh go on, please do
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
November 1, 2010 3:26pm

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« General Debate 30 October 2010

The Wilce Inquiry Report »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 37.3K other subscribers

Highlights

Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments
Health Target 3 – Emergency Dept Waiting Times
Health Target 2 – Immunisations

Top Stories

General Debate 02 November 2024
General Debate 03 November 2024
Guest Post: Thoughts on New Zealands Power Supply
Keep them away from GST
You can target men's issues, without it being at the expense of women
Kemi wins
Save Kiwis, not feathers
General Debate 01 November 2024
Nate Silver's 24 reasons Trump could win
Bezos on endorsements

Recent Posts

Major party vote share 3 November 2024
Kemi wins 3 November 2024
General Debate 03 November 2024 3 November 2024
Nate Silver’s 24 reasons Trump could win 3 November 2024
You can target men’s issues, without it being at the expense of women 2 November 2024
Guest Post: Thoughts on New Zealands Power Supply 2 November 2024
General Debate 02 November 2024 2 November 2024
Keep them away from GST 2 November 2024
Save Kiwis, not feathers 1 November 2024
Bezos on endorsements 1 November 2024
Meet a peace activist 1 November 2024
General Debate 01 November 2024 1 November 2024

Recent Comments

General Debate 03 November 2024
PeeJay
General Debate 03 November 2024
Steve Otto(North Shore)
Kemi wins
Ghost
Kemi wins
Michael Sommerville
Kemi wins
MCōs
Kemi wins
Grunter
General Debate 03 November 2024
Greenheart
Kemi wins
imalwaysright
General Debate 03 November 2024
NeverMindTheBollocks
General Debate 03 November 2024
mandk
Kemi wins
Pope Punctilious II
General Debate 03 November 2024
mandk
General Debate 03 November 2024
blue collar
General Debate 03 November 2024
kevn
Nate Silver’s 24 reasons Trump could win
Grunter

Links

Woman of the day
Hompaddock
The strange case of the I am Hope funding
The Standard
You Read It here First – I bet you’re sorry about that
No Minister
11.30am Live from Pennsylvania – Waatea Sunday Morning Political Podcast US Election Special
The Daily Blog
Battle of Beersheba – Canadian Frustration – Balfour Declaration I THE G…
Utopia
"The paradox of 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is that the phrase is used only by the very people who are suffering from it."
Not PC
Some sporting reflections
Point of Order
The High Court says "Land Back"
No Right Turn
Why you should reject the term “Christian nationalism”
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
US military-industrial-sports complex.
Kiwipolitico
MILLION DOLLAR REWARD
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
United Rugby Championship Predictions for Week 7
Stats Chat
The Battle for Democracy
NZCPR
Pretty (il)legal
Croaking Cassandra
Where are the food carts?
Offsetting Behaviour
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2024 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d