Editorials 20 February 2010
The NZ Herald slams the latest stunt by the anti-whaling activists:
Peter Bethune knew precisely what he was doing, and the consequences, when he boarded the whaling vessel Shonan Maru 2 to make what fellow-protesters described as a citizen’s arrest of its captain. …
Mr Bethune was intent simply on grabbing publicity. He, and the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, wanted to prompt a diplomatic incident, thereby putting further pressure on the Japanese to end whaling. …
The Dominion Post argues against a city wide liquor ban:
On one of Wellington’s rare balmy nights there is little to compare to a quiet picnic on the south coast, watching the sun go down and the kids paddle in the surf as you enjoy some cold roast chicken, a nice green salad , and a glass of Martinborough’s best sauvignon blanc.
Soon that pleasure may come with the dubious frisson of being a law-breaker, and the prospect of a visit from police to tell you you are breaching a Wellington City Council bylaw. Under the proposed liquor ban, the wine has to be tipped out on the sand, or the picnic packed up and moved to a non-public place. If you refuse, you will be arrested. If you wait till police go away and then carry on enjoying your picnic, you will be arrested should they return.
That is the future that could face Wellingtonians should the city council go ahead and pass its city-wide booze ban.
It’s a daft idea that should be shot down. Have outdoors liquor bans in areas where there is a problem.
The Press talks about the future of their regional council:
Environment Canterbury chairman Alec Neill managed to put on a brave face after the damning report into his institution’s performance and governance yesterday. The reality is that if the Government adopts the recommendations in the report, ECan as we know it today will be gone. …
The report will provide vindication for the region’s mayors, business figures and farmers, who have been queuing up to slate ECan for some years.
They would also agree with the comment of review leader Wyatt Creech that ECan had a “fortress” and “we know best” culture. …
I predict it will be gone.
The ODT talks about electoral issues:
It will be recalled that, in 2005, the Exclusive Brethren attempted to influence the outcome of the poll by mounting a covert and costly campaign against the Greens and Labour.
Labour had also been concerned about the extent to which campaign finance was both anonymous and uncapped, raising the spectre, it claimed, of “big money” interests tilting the odds against a fair contest: the even playing field argument.
In an attempt to close loopholes in the campaign finance rules, and to prevent parties “jumping the gun” and subverting the spending caps, it also created a controversial regulated campaign period of three months prior to polling day.
Ummn, no. That was the old regulated period. Labour extended the period to be all of election year.