About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

May 31, 2007 8:32pm by David Farrar

Heroes

Great season finale for a great show. Bring on Season Two!!

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment14

Uncategorised
Reviews

Comments (14)

Login to comment or vote

Peter Metcalfe

A bit impatient with the Bittorent there, aren’t you? There’s only two more episodes to go down here. It’s not like Battlestar Galactica when they’ve only just started screening season 2.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
May 31, 2007 11:07pm
Craig Ranapia

It’s not like Battlestar Galactica when they’ve only just started screening season 2.

Where?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 8:06am
Graeme Edgeler

TV3. Tuesdays 11:17pm. Started last week.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 8:24am
JBA

Heroes…the TV highlight of my week. Finally, a replacement for The West Wing.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 9:51am
Josh

SPOILERS! BIG FREAKING SPOILERS RIGHT HERE!!!

DID I MENTION THERE ARE SPOILERS?

While Heroes has been my favourite show this year, I thought it peaked with “Five Years Gone” and slid into a bit of an anti-climax for the finale. It was all a bit contrived — Peter just loses control of his radiation power, even when he had twice before been able to control it? Sylar just stands there while Hiro yells, runs and stabs him, when he had been able to stop him and snap his sword two episodes ago? Claire shooting Peter would be a bad thing but Nathan sacrificing himself is OK?

I’m really looking forward to Season 2 as well, but I hope they can wrap it up better than they did with Season 1.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 10:16am
Kent

What Josh said x2. An anti-climactic finale if ever I saw one.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 1:17pm
Jman

I didn’t get why Nathan had to sacrifice himself to fly Peter into the sky. Peter could have just flown himself.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 1:53pm
Jman

Or if Peter was unable to fly suddenly cos he was overcome with the radiation power, Nathan could have just flown him out over the ocean and dropped him there.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 1:55pm
Craig Ranapia

I didn’t get why Nathan had to sacrifice himself to fly Peter into the sky. Peter could have just flown himself.

To get all geeked out, Ted’s power would intensify – and become difficult to control – when he was wound up, and why would it be any different for Peter? And just because he can ‘borrow’ other people’s powers doesn’t mean he can access them at will – let alone control ’em.

And come on, didn’t anyone get a wee bit choked up when Nathan said, “You saved the cheerleader, so we could save the world.” Not really where I saw him ending up at the beginning – or even a couple of weeks ago. Hell, Linderman’s cured your wife who was crippled in an accident you blame yourself for. You’re on the fast track to The White House as part of a grand design your family has been involved in since the beginning to usher in world peace and all that lovely stuff… and all you have to do is be anyplace else than Kirby Plaza, and let your brother, daughter and millions of strangers die.

And I wouldn’t assume either Petrelli brother is ‘sacrificed’ yet — apparently both actors have re-signed for next season, but when we’re talking about a televisual comic book that could mean almost anything.

TV3. Tuesdays 11:17pm. Started last week.

So I can stop pushing the DVDs on everyone I meet. 🙂 Still, the graveyard shift is a bugger. OK, I thought it was really unlikely to get the Staurday 7.30 slot again given it gets really, really dark but just take a look at the shit they put on between 8.30-10.30.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 2:22pm
Josh

And come on, didn’t anyone get a wee bit choked up when Nathan said, “You saved the cheerleader, so we could save the world.”

No, I was busy thinking “hang on – you’re saying it’s better for both Peter and Nathan to die than it is for just Peter to die?” The only upside seemed to be the Claire wouldn’t have to suffer the trauma of shooting her own uncle — instead she just got to watch both her uncle and her father explode…

Sure, you could easily construct a scenario where they both survived (in fact, “Five Years Gone” showed explicitly that Peter would survive exploding), but as far as both characters knew, they were sacrificing their lives.

Anyway, the point is you can justify the events of the finale, but if it had been better written, you wouldn’t be required to.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 3:07pm
Graeme Edgeler

Speaking of Battlestar – ’twas announced today that the fourth season will be the last:

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117966089.html?categoryid=14&cs=1
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 5:40pm
David Farrar

The final episode was about redemption for Nathan, and for me it worked. Agree the Sylar death scene would have been done better. Of course he is not dead.

Glad BSG is only doing one more season. It is a superb show but having found Earth they need to wrap it up next series.

Can’t believe Lost has announced three more seasons. Not sure how they will keep a credible plot up.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 1, 2007 8:41pm
francis

are you guys watching this online? or have i now got “mising time” to add to my alien abduction symptoms?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 2, 2007 9:38am
stan

surresh could’ve just killed syler when he knocked him out with the bookcase a few episodes back, but instead decided to take peter back to his aunt’s and leave syler and the gun back at his house. then he returns to his house later assuming syler would be gone

the ending was crap, it wasn’t ’til then though that i myself realised i’d just wasted 23(?) hours of my life watching the season. can’t be fucked with season 2 really
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 4, 2007 12:52am

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« Key on Campbell Live

Williams says ten MPs to go? »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 37.4K other subscribers

Highlights

Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments
Health Target 3 – Emergency Dept Waiting Times
Health Target 2 – Immunisations

Top Stories

General Debate 22 November 2024
General Debate 23 November 2024
The newest Green MP
Do the KCs believe in democracy
Can we afford such generous research leave?
Secret lawyers
A cunning plan?
Hot off the Press: Term 3 School Attendance Data
The $800,000 lotto draw for researchers
Who are the major emitters?

Recent Posts

RANZ Update 23 November 2024
Who are the major emitters? 23 November 2024
A whale on a prediction market 23 November 2024
General Debate 23 November 2024 23 November 2024
Can we afford such generous research leave? 23 November 2024
Secret lawyers 22 November 2024
Do the KCs believe in democracy 22 November 2024
The newest Green MP 22 November 2024
About time 22 November 2024
The $800,000 lotto draw for researchers 22 November 2024
General Debate 22 November 2024 22 November 2024
A cunning plan? 22 November 2024

Recent Comments

RANZ Update
Souvlaki
General Debate 23 November 2024
Yvette
Who are the major emitters?
bythesea
General Debate 23 November 2024
AitchW
General Debate 23 November 2024
MCōs
Who are the major emitters?
Benedict Yu
Who are the major emitters?
judith8409121
Who are the major emitters?
judith8409121
RANZ Update
Grizz
Can we afford such generous research leave?
Nigel
Can we afford such generous research leave?
tas
General Debate 23 November 2024
NeverMindTheBollocks
Who are the major emitters?
LCI
General Debate 23 November 2024
Steve Otto(North Shore)
Who are the major emitters?
kowtow

Links

Derek Mackie: For what it's worth
Breaking Views
Treaty Principles Debate
NZCPR
€ 500 Billion for Coal and Gas Seems Expensive
No Minister
Word of the day
Hompaddock
Much ado about cussing…
Point of Order
Attorney-General and Chief Justice reveal contrasting visions of judicial power
Utopia
A guide to making a submission on the Treaty Principles Bill
The Standard
You all understand these gang patch bans will get challenged in Court right?
The Daily Blog
Justice in Brazil
No Right Turn
"Seymour is only doing openly what M?ori nationalists and their Pakeha allies have been doing, quietly for the past 50 years."
Not PC
The transgender agenda sunk Kamala
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
What does “reciprocity” mean in New Zealand laws?
Croaking Cassandra
Media Link: “A View from Afar” on the US elections.
Kiwipolitico
This will not end well
Offsetting Behaviour
Top 14 Predictions for Round 10
Stats Chat
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2024 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d