About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

August 9, 2005 11:27am by David Farrar

Dating Stories

Insolent Prick is trying to compete with Cathy for most outrageous dating stories.

We await Part Two.

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment43

Uncategorized
Uncategorized

Comments (43)

Login to comment or vote

Cathy

It is not a competition.

I am positively nice, polite and quiet compared with that guy!!

Part 2 of the story I predict will see Miss Coromandel hurt, shamed and humiliated.

I have never done that to any male.
0 0
Report
August 9, 2005 1:30pm
Insolent Prick

Wondering just how long I can tantalise readers with the promise of a second part, before they accuse me of doing a Winston!
0 0
Report
August 9, 2005 1:39pm
dim

Heh. Presumably after shagging the teenage beauty queen he went off and beat up loads of gang-members and ninjas. Ain’t the internet wonderful?
0 0
Report
August 9, 2005 2:24pm
Insolent Prick

I agree, Dim. The internet is a wonderful thing.

Envy isn’t.
0 0
Report
August 9, 2005 2:35pm
pundito

he’s a lefty, it comes with the territory (how else can they justify their dogma?)
0 0
Report
August 9, 2005 3:11pm
dim

Prick – you should take your blog to it’s logical conclusion and write a post claiming to have a huge dick.

Then I’ll be really jealous.
0 0
Report
August 9, 2005 3:44pm
Insolent Prick

Dim, it’s not just the size of the tool that matters, although that is important.

It’s about how it handles in the wet.
0 0
Report
August 9, 2005 4:02pm
Belt

Yawn.
0 0
Report
August 9, 2005 8:53pm
Whig

Good God Russell Brown is a humourless twat:

“…one of the more curious characteristics of the local right-wing blogosphere is the frequency with which its denizens need to keep assuring everyone they’re getting some, oh yes they are. In which spirit, this story from Insolent Prick, which DPF thinks is hilarious (which it is, although not in the way that IP presumably intended).”

Geez, does EVERYTHING have to be about partisan politics Russell? Methinks the poor man is a little sexually frustrated himself…

Oh, and Russell, right wingers and classical liberals do have better sex lives, mainly because we shower and shave occasionally ;o)
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 12:15pm
Insolent Prick

Who is Russell Brown? Never heard of the dickless non-wonder!
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 12:21pm
Whig

You just answered your own question IP. But here is the link:

http://publicaddress.net/default,2402.sm#post2402
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 12:29pm
Insolent Prick

I’m not particularly fascinated with the idea that some random pinko commie is trying to capture some of my audience by attempting to associate himself with my blog. What kind of limp-wristed name is Russell, anyway?
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 1:04pm
dim

Russells comment does seem like a harsh generalisation – I can’t think of any other right-wing New Zealand blogers that have posted their sexual fantasies online. Actually, I don’t think we’ve seen such a transparent cri du coeur from any other New Zealand bloggers, left or right.

Poor little guy . . .
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 1:22pm
Cathy

The funniest part about IP’s post is that it is bound to upset precious little retentives like Brown.

Good job IP.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 1:58pm
David Farrar

I emailed Russell to point out that I don’t like the suggestion that I endorse something by linking to it.

I also mentioned to him that I don’t believe anyone could be as neathandal as IP purports to be, and it is pretty obviously a windup.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 2:42pm
Insolent Prick

What I find slightly curious is the inference from wowser pinkos that I’m bragging and fantasising. The purpose of the post was not to wind up hen-pecked commies who aren’t getting any. Nor, as you’ve observed, Cathy, was it to compete with you.

I felt strong peer pressure to document the Miss Coromandel story, due to constant references to me and Miss Coromandel on your blog, in addition to others. It was only fair that I set the story straight.

Which is what I’ve done, in the most matter-of-fact way possible.

Pity that the only point that the retarded Left take from reading my blog is that I’m somehow parading the fact that I get to pork lots of hot chicks, and I don’t. It is a fact: I do pork lots of hot chicks, and they don’t. But that’s self-evident. And the reasons why they don’t get any are very clear.

They’re the dregs of society. The humourless losers. The blamers. The “Waaaa! Mummy! Somebody stepped on my toe, and I’m too much of a bitch-boy to slap them back!” kinda people. The envious bottom-dwellers, who instead of succeeding in life, can only ever hold resentment in their hearts that they’re not getting what the rest of us have worked very hard to achieve.

So I’m not offended by them. Not at all. And by the same degree, I don’t care if they are offended.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 2:48pm
dim

You don’t endorse something by linking to it, true. But you kinda do by implying that you’re looking forward to the sequel.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 3:24pm
David Farrar

I look forward to reading many left wing blogs also but doesn’t mean I endorse them. Endorse means agree with the views expressed.

I don’t think gays burn in hell and women are just good for sex. But for that matter I don’t think IP does either, and that he was being provocative for the sake of telling the story.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 3:34pm
donna

You don’t have to be a lefty to reach the conclusion that ‘Prick’ (natch!) is a pretty sad, lonely little guy.

And as for his site being a wind-up, the only truly shocking thing on it is the statement that he’s in his early 30’s!

He comes off as a fourteen year old schoolboy who’s read too much PJ O’Rourke. I hope for his sake that’s really the case.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 3:43pm
Insolent Prick

Donna, there are two kinds of chicks who disagree with me:

1. Pinko Commie Hen-Pecking Sows; and
2. Ugly Chicks.

The two groups are by no means mutually exclusive, but without going much further, which of the two groups are you in?
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 5:10pm
Donna

The comments section of Pricks blog is also a comic goldmine.

Cathy Odgers writes:

. . . Women are attracted to you because they think they can tame or change you. It is so funny to watch because you are real and they can’t.

I have never met a socialist who could attract women the same way the likes of you do.

They are jealous.’

To which Insolent Prick replies:

‘. . . The good news is that in the cool, good-looking, and successful circles, hot chicks are easy lays. It may be difficult for the pinko commies to come to grips with that easy fact: that hot chicks dig successful guys. . .’

There’s plenty more like this, including entries in which Prick drunkenly beats up all his workmates but doesn’t get fired because he’s so AMAZING at his job (at which he earns LOADS of money) that the company would collapse without him.

Keep it coming.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 5:57pm
pundito

Donna: IP may seem way over the top and full of BS, but there are people out there who are IPs in every facet of their lives. They typically earn over $100k, (you don’t get to that income unless you are good or can Bullshit your way there), and having that kind of income, tend to buy better everything. When I lived in Wellington, there were whole rugby teams of these type of guys running around. They always had loads of women hanging around, and naturally if the pickings are good, the guys would tend to favour the hotties, and so the bar got raised, and everybody had to step up or get ignored.
Unfortunately for ugly fat women, biology determines that men can have a fall back option, that of good provider for the offspring, even if they are Fugly themselves- harder to pull off no doubt. (The guy who does Child of my Time has done quite a bit of work on this area, and even had a demo on one of his shows where he pulled up outside a store on rodeo drive, in a Rolls or similar, the table of chicks he pulled up next to thought he looked attractive, they didn’t give him the time of day when he had strolled dressed up in University professor attire Old fashioned tweed jacket etc.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 6:36pm
Cathy

Donna,

Don’t take offence to any of this. IP is a brilliant character.

He is a real guy writing the stuff, but moreso and more importantly he represents a real section of society that would not be allowed to behave the way they do if certain types of women were not so stupid and airheaded to see that these kind of guys are really very bad for them.

There is nothing funnier than watching a friend of mine who is an IP himself, go out with these stupid silly little girls who think they can change him or be “the one”. Despite all the warning signs these women CONSISTENTLY put the money (funnier as most of it is all in trust) and the good times ahead of what is important. Of course, that is being with someone who is not a complete and total arsehole and actually respects you.

IP’s of this world are put on it to teach these silly little girls a lesson. Enjoy it.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 7:13pm
sally

Donna – you are entitled to stamp your foot, sulk, pout, roll your eyes, fold your arms, and act in an indignant fashion, when describing and recalling the sheer chutzpah of Insolent Prick.

Alterntively, simply don’t read his blog.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 9:22pm
Cathy

Now…note my prediction in first comment above and read the conclusion of the story.

“Part 2 of the story I predict will see Miss Coromandel hurt, shamed and humiliated.

I have never done that to any male”……..

And so she was.

So predictable………….seen it a million times.

IP was an arsehole for lying to her and taking date 2 to same bar he took Miss Coro but Miss Coro deserved it for being a stupid bitch in the first place.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 9:44pm
Red Fred

IP’s daughter.I cannot wait till my good looking well paid brothers double team her,or his mother,they are not fussy.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 9:45pm
Insolent_Prick

Red Fred, if they’re your brothers, then you’re genetically connected, which makes the likelihood of them being either good-looking or well-paid extremely low.
0 0
Report
August 10, 2005 10:14pm
Hmmmm

IP do you play the piano as well as sing?
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 1:32am
Red Fred

IP,specialist bat stroker,his own bat of course.I tried to interest my brothers in ya mudder IP ,but they assured me they did have some standards,low by all accounts.I thought that should qualify them perfectly,they said not thatlow!!!!,they have some standards.Shit I said what happenned to”any old slut wiill do”.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 5:29am
Insolent Prick

What is this, Hmmmm? The Spanish Frigging Inquisition?

That reminds me of a story. Good reminder. Ta.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 9:28am
Cathy

Actually, I have had an idea for a story.

Miss Ten dates IP and they both blog their respective stories of the evening.

Set it up Farrar, this election week is awfully boring.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 5:36pm
Insolent Prick

Who the bejeezus is Miss Ten? Is she nice and slutty?

Actually, I don’t believe in your theory that only some chicks are slutty and silly, Cathy. All chicks are basically like that.

Bring on the hottest, most virtuous, prim young thing, and the result will be the same.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 5:56pm
David Farrar

I’m not sure IP going home by himself would be much of a story. And Miss Ten is not presently available for dating!
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 6:01pm
Cathy

IP meet Miss Ten

http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/archives/008388.html

More than met your match IP.

Unfortunately for you she seems rather smart.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 6:04pm
Lucyna

See, IP, this is what happens when you don’t work your way up the blogs, first by reading, then commenting, and then when you get either brave enough or annoyed enough, starting your own blog. Then you’d know who Miss Ten was.

And you obviously haven’t met enough women to think that all of us are slutty and silly.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 6:11pm
Red Fred

AL asshole I got $1000 to punt on my brother Glenn outearning you tinpotter by at least $200k or shut up unless you do earn $400K.Money talks ,bullshit walks.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 8:47pm
Red Fred

AL asshole I got $1000 to punt on my brother Glenn outearning you tinpotter by at least $200k or shut up unless you do earn $400K.Money talks ,bullshit walks.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 8:48pm
Lucyna

Red, AL’s not around at the moment. Maybe later tonight or tomorrow. Can see you’re getting a tad impatient there. Of course, he might just ignore you.
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 8:53pm
rob hosking

Utterly shameless plug here..

I think this theme – especially RB’s accusation that all bloggers from what is vaguely called the right side of the political specturm are over-anxious to discuss their sex lives – has great potential and I’ve posted on the topic at http://hosking.blogspot.com/2005/08/sex-and-liberal-conservative-blogs.html
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 9:21pm
Anna

No I am not ‘nice and slutty’ – nor am I single 🙂
0 0
Report
August 11, 2005 9:32pm
nigel 6888

tut tut Red, discussing money in company, tiresome as well as unutterably vulgar.
0 0
Report
August 12, 2005 10:59pm
Dominic

I feel free to discuss the details of my sex life. Especially in a forum such as this. I’ve kept everything under wraps (though of course I can never bring myself to use a condom) for such a long time and I don’t expect everyone to understand what it’s like for me but I can see that most of the people who read this blog will understand where I am coming from.

I guess you could draw some line between the sexual abuse that I suffered when I was growing up and the way that I enjoy myself now. However I wouldn’t. It seems like a bit of a cop out to me.

Something those liberal commie pinkos would say.

Personally I think that it was simply that I started having sex with girls at a young age. She was 9 and I was 13. And I never liked the look of anything over that age after then. I think the oldest girl that I have every really enjoyed was 14. I’ve slept with a few actual woman but they never turn me on. There is just too much going on. They always expect some kind of emotional response from me and I am not willing to give anything like that to another person.

Anyway. I would just like to say that I agree with you all. I am a prominent business man, very rich and successful and I never have any problems getting it. Enjoyed the post IP. I have a group of friends that has a standing bet that we can humiliate and destroy any woman that is nominated by the others. Perhaps you would like to participate?

Cheers
0 0
Report
August 13, 2005 10:02am
Rowan

Hate to blow this for you folks but I know the chick who writes this blog. She’s one of those feminists who thinks they are funny.
0 0
Report
August 15, 2005 9:22am

« Not much of an audit

Tax Cuts vs Free Interest »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 37.4K other subscribers

Highlights

Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments
Health Target 3 – Emergency Dept Waiting Times
Health Target 2 – Immunisations

Top Stories

General Debate 15 November 2024
General Debate 16 November 2024
What Labour voters think of Willie
A great grift against taxpayers
Marsden Fund goes even more woke
Another win for the FSU
Make principals accountable
Waste, waste, waste
Ad: ACT New Zealand is hiring!
Two good bills

Recent Posts

A good Social Investment Board 16 November 2024
Two good bills 16 November 2024
General Debate 16 November 2024 16 November 2024
A great grift against taxpayers 16 November 2024
Waste, waste, waste 15 November 2024
Ad: ACT New Zealand is hiring! 15 November 2024
Another win for the FSU 15 November 2024
General Debate 15 November 2024 15 November 2024
Marsden Fund goes even more woke 15 November 2024
What Labour voters think of Willie 14 November 2024
How would NZ Labour do using this vision 14 November 2024
Matt Gaetz for Attorney-General must be a troll? 14 November 2024

Recent Comments

General Debate 16 November 2024
Steve Otto(North Shore)
A good Social Investment Board
artemisia
A good Social Investment Board
gravedodger
General Debate 16 November 2024
graham
A good Social Investment Board
Cactus Kate
A good Social Investment Board
Swifty
General Debate 16 November 2024
fernglas
Two good bills
wsk12345
A good Social Investment Board
Benedict Yu
A good Social Investment Board
Sparrow
General Debate 16 November 2024
Ghost
General Debate 16 November 2024
kevn
General Debate 16 November 2024
rouppe
A good Social Investment Board
kowtow
General Debate 16 November 2024
cmm

Links

No Mr Brash your claim to vote for Harris is flawed.
No Minister
Word of the day
Hompaddock
The Climate Case of the Century
Utopia
ACT launched a bad faith attack on the Treaty and now cry like snowflakes because of a Haka
The Daily Blog
A great grift against taxpayers
Point of Order
More lawlessness from National
No Right Turn
Open mike 16/11/2024
The Standard
Shock & Surprise: Lawyers oppose removal of lawyers' gravy train
Not PC
Thankfully we said nope to dope
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
A NEW DEGREE COURSE FOR MASSEY
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
A Day of Reckoning
NZCPR
Media Link: “A View from Afar” on the US elections.
Kiwipolitico
This will not end well
Offsetting Behaviour
Top 14 Predictions for Round 10
Stats Chat
Pretty (il)legal
Croaking Cassandra
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2024 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d