About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

June 22, 2005 1:16pm by David Farrar

Some more ACT Billboards

Heh heh. They’re a bit cruel but a reader sent these to me, and I can’t resist showing them.

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment15

Uncategorized

Comments (15)

Login to comment or vote

of course

Of course they could say
Socialism

Today, Tomorrow Never

given National’s history of being merely a pale image of Labour.
0 0
Report
June 22, 2005 1:45pm
rightkiwi

Excellent billboards. A vote for ACT is a vote for Labour, and National needs to say so. And, Actoids, spare us the “National are socialists too”. If you really think that there is no difference between Prime Minister Brash and Prime Minister Clark then you should piss off overseas because you’ll never get a non-socialist government under your definition.
0 0
Report
June 22, 2005 2:22pm
TheProphet

Sir David – I see Jordan has just posted some “funny” ones on his site. Its great to see the mindset when they are just playing into Nationals hands. Jeezzz free advertising on Just Left.Doesn’t matter what they say they all come from the National campaign. You guys are good.

Allah protect us.
0 0
Report
June 22, 2005 2:52pm
Bernard Woolley

Gee that first one reminds me of a National board I made a few weeks back – http://bernardwoolley.blogspot.com/2005/06/national-billboard-rip-off-cullen.html
0 0
Report
June 22, 2005 11:24pm
Conor

Red. Blue. Yellow.
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 9:33am
pundito

If you are implying that ACT are pro- asian by that comment Conor, then I am sure they would take that as a compliment. If you meant it as a sign of cowardice, then who was it who turned up to various marae/ wananga sites to face the accused so to speak, after information and facts instigating various people had been released? Is that cowardice? What say you to Maharey’s refusal to visit various schools which he marked for closure earlier this term? Or King’s forced revamping of Murchison despite it not being in the best interests of Nelson Marlborough populace at large?
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 10:39am
Conor

No no, nothing like that – Just red blue yellow
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 11:23am
pundito

bloody typical leftie, try to sling crap, but have no basis for the insult, and then, are too chicken to justify thier primary statement. Who yella now Cunna
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 11:39am
pundito

Typical Leftie BS then, is it Cunna? Sling some unfounded crap around, then try to deny everything when the time comes to justify your accusation. That in my books is yella!
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 11:52am
Conor

No pundito, you have me all wrong. I simply point out that the colours are Red. Blue. Yellow. It has nothing to do with race, in fact it has nothing to do with anything at all.

It was more of an ironic symbological interpretation of the portrayal of party political values in the guise of a colour linked to the histories of varying parties.
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 12:21pm
Gooner

…which is why Destiny is black Conor!
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 12:28pm
David Seymour

Rightkiwi is well, right about the difference between Brash and Clark being significantly different.

Problem is this is not a Presidential campaign and Brash in combination with Peters and his own socialist caucus actually won’t produce policy much different to Clark. If you believe in Brash you should be voting ACT to let him be himself.
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 3:04pm
David Seymour

Rightkiwi is well, right about the difference between Brash and Clark being significantly different.

Problem is this is not a Presidential campaign and Brash in combination with Peters and his own socialist caucus actually won’t produce policy much different to Clark. If you believe in Brash you should be voting ACT to let him be himself.
0 0
Report
June 23, 2005 3:06pm
PaulL

Conor – what am I missing? Is it a flag? Have you just learned your colours? I presume it means something, and I don’t think it means what pundito thinks – else what do the red and blue mean? I must be being slow.
0 0
Report
June 24, 2005 8:24pm
James

Does that mean that the red of Labour signifys all the blood the socialists have spilit over the years…?
0 0
Report
June 24, 2005 11:11pm

Spinning the Polls »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Never miss a post

Email Address

Join 37.4K other subscribers

Highlights

Health Target 5 – elective treatments
Health Target 4 – Specialist appointments
Health Target 3 – Emergency Dept Waiting Times
Health Target 2 – Immunisations

Top Stories

General Debate 24 November 2024
Guest Post: Response to Max Harris
A $25 million glasshouse
Small but promising change
RANZ Update
Who are the major emitters?
General Debate 23 November 2024
The newest Green MP
Can we afford such generous research leave?
Do the KCs believe in democracy

Recent Posts

Small but promising change 24 November 2024
A $25 million glasshouse 24 November 2024
General Debate 24 November 2024 24 November 2024
Guest Post: Response to Max Harris 24 November 2024
RANZ Update 23 November 2024
Who are the major emitters? 23 November 2024
A whale on a prediction market 23 November 2024
General Debate 23 November 2024 23 November 2024
Can we afford such generous research leave? 23 November 2024
Secret lawyers 22 November 2024
Do the KCs believe in democracy 22 November 2024
The newest Green MP 22 November 2024

Recent Comments

General Debate 24 November 2024
waikatosinger
General Debate 24 November 2024
Burtland
General Debate 24 November 2024
Burtland
General Debate 24 November 2024
Burtland
General Debate 24 November 2024
Jack5
General Debate 24 November 2024
AitchW
General Debate 24 November 2024
Prince
General Debate 24 November 2024
Jack5
General Debate 24 November 2024
Haast
Small but promising change
David Garrett
General Debate 24 November 2024
Haast
General Debate 24 November 2024
NoFax
General Debate 24 November 2024
Matt Long
General Debate 24 November 2024
NoFax
General Debate 24 November 2024
NoFax

Links

Automakers’ Costly Gamble on EVs: A Lesson in Ignoring Consumer Demand
Utopia
Hey Razor – What The Hell Is Going On With The All Blacks
No Minister
END GAME
The Standard
MEDIAWATCH: Q+A – Jack Tame destroys David Seymour
The Daily Blog
Word of the day
Hompaddock
Treaty Principles Debate
NZCPR
Much ado about cussing…
Point of Order
Justice in Brazil
No Right Turn
"Seymour is only doing openly what M?ori nationalists and their Pakeha allies have been doing, quietly for the past 50 years."
Not PC
The transgender agenda sunk Kamala
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
What does “reciprocity” mean in New Zealand laws?
Croaking Cassandra
This will not end well
Offsetting Behaviour
Top 14 Predictions for Round 10
Stats Chat
Tory Whanau may have to sell Wellington mayoralty to make ends meet
The Civilian
The Accidental Engagement
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2024 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d